Numerical simulation of bonding performance between GFRP and lightweight aggregate concrete

Abstract This study investigates the bonding performance between Glass Fiber-Reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and Lightweight Aggregate Concrete (LWAC). We established 81 central pull-out numerical simulation scenarios to analyze the influence of four factors—lightweight aggregate concrete strength grade, GFRP bar diameters, GFRP bar rib height, and GFRP bar bonding length—on the bonding performance between LWAC and GFRP bars. The results indicated that considering the surface characteristics of GFRP and the intrinsic model of LWAC, the bonding damage pattern between GFRP and LWAC can be accurately reflected. The damage patterns observed in the simulations were generally consistent with experimental findings. The ultimate bond strength between GFRP and concrete increased with the increase in LWAC strength. However, beyond a concrete strength of 50 MPa, the enhancement in ultimate bond strength becomes marginal. Within a certain range, the ultimate bond strength decreases with increasing GFRP diameter and bond length, while it increases with increasing GFRP rib height. The predictions from our GFRP and LWAC bonding strength model closely matched the experimental values, with prediction errors within 15%. The numerical simulation method and the ultimate bond strength prediction model established in this paper provide scientific reference and theoretical support for the evaluation of the bonding performance between lightweight aggregate concrete and GFRP bars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Research Express
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/adb013
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical simulation of bonding performance between GFRP and lightweight aggregate concrete

Yinmao Wang, Ying Ba, Zhang Liu, Haibin Chen et al.
Engineering Research Express
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Numerical simulation of bonding performance between GFRP and lightweight aggregate concrete

Yinmao Wang, Ying Ba, Zhang Liu, Haibin Chen, Liwei Wu, Xueyuan Guo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the bonding performance between Glass Fiber-Reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and Lightweight Aggregate Concrete (LWAC). We established 81 central pull-out numerical simulation scenarios to analyze the influence of four factors—lightweight aggregate concrete strength grade, GFRP bar diameters, GFRP bar rib height, and GFRP bar bonding length—on the bonding performance between LWAC and GFRP bars. The results indicated that considering the surface characteristics of GFRP and the intrinsic model of LWAC, the bonding damage pattern between GFRP and LWAC can be accurately reflected. The damage patterns observed in the simulations were generally consistent with experimental findings. The ultimate bond strength between GFRP and concrete increased with the increase in LWAC strength. However, beyond a concrete strength of 50 MPa, the enhancement in ultimate bond strength becomes marginal. Within a certain range, the ultimate bond strength decreases with increasing GFRP diameter and bond length, while it increases with increasing GFRP rib height. The predictions from our GFRP and LWAC bonding strength model closely matched the experimental values, with prediction errors within 15%. The numerical simulation method and the ultimate bond strength prediction model established in this paper provide scientific reference and theoretical support for the evaluation of the bonding performance between lightweight aggregate concrete and GFRP bars.

Engineering Research ExpressVol. 7(1)
North China University of Science and Technology (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.