An asymmetric Late Cretaceous back-arc basin south of Tibet?

Abstract The Indus-Yarlung suture zone (southern Tibet) between the Indian plate–derived Tibetan Himalaya and the Asian continental crust intruded by the Gangdese magmatic arc of southern Tibet hosts a <20-km-wide band of ophiolites overlain by Asia-derived clastic sedimentary rocks of the Xigaze forearc basin. How wide this basin was prior to India-Asia collision is unknown: it may have been a typical forearc basin width, i.e., ~150–200 km, but was also proposed to have become separated from Tibet in the Late Cretaceous by a back-arc basin thousands of kilometers wide. To test this, we present the first paleomagnetic study of upper Cretaceous redbeds of the 71.2–69.3 Ma Padana Formation in the Xigaze forearc basin, near Sangsang town, Ngamring county, Tibet, China (~86°E). High-temperature magnetic components were isolated at 580 °C or 600–680 °C and passed reversal and fold tests demonstrating a primary magnetization that we corrected for inclination shallowing. Our results reveal that the Xigaze forearc basin at ~86°E was situated at 18.4° ± 3.6°N at ca. 70 Ma, indicating a separation from Lhasa of <500 km. To reconcile our new data with coeval, much lower, paleolatitudes from the Ladakh arc to the west (~77°E) we reconstruct a Late Cretaceous–Paleogene opening and closure of an asymmetric back-arc basin in the western Neotethys. This suggests that the distribution of India-Asia convergence was laterally unevenly partitioned over the pre-collisional plate boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geology
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1130/g52634.1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An asymmetric Late Cretaceous back-arc basin south of Tibet?

Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen, Shihua Xu, Teng Wang, Yongxiang Li et al.
4 citations
Geology
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
7.47
article

An asymmetric Late Cretaceous back-arc basin south of Tibet?

Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen, Shihua Xu, Teng Wang, Yongxiang Li, Xinyu Liu, Xianghui Li, Binchen Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Indus-Yarlung suture zone (southern Tibet) between the Indian plate–derived Tibetan Himalaya and the Asian continental crust intruded by the Gangdese magmatic arc of southern Tibet hosts a <20-km-wide band of ophiolites overlain by Asia-derived clastic sedimentary rocks of the Xigaze forearc basin. How wide this basin was prior to India-Asia collision is unknown: it may have been a typical forearc basin width, i.e., ~150–200 km, but was also proposed to have become separated from Tibet in the Late Cretaceous by a back-arc basin thousands of kilometers wide. To test this, we present the first paleomagnetic study of upper Cretaceous redbeds of the 71.2–69.3 Ma Padana Formation in the Xigaze forearc basin, near Sangsang town, Ngamring county, Tibet, China (~86°E). High-temperature magnetic components were isolated at 580 °C or 600–680 °C and passed reversal and fold tests demonstrating a primary magnetization that we corrected for inclination shallowing. Our results reveal that the Xigaze forearc basin at ~86°E was situated at 18.4° ± 3.6°N at ca. 70 Ma, indicating a separation from Lhasa of <500 km. To reconcile our new data with coeval, much lower, paleolatitudes from the Ladakh arc to the west (~77°E) we reconstruct a Late Cretaceous–Paleogene opening and closure of an asymmetric back-arc basin in the western Neotethys. This suggests that the distribution of India-Asia convergence was laterally unevenly partitioned over the pre-collisional plate boundaries.

GeologyVol. 53(5)
Utrecht University (NL), Northwest University (CN), Continental (United Kingdom) (GB), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
7.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.