The Rutherford-Harkins-Landau-Chadwick Key–II. Fusion Interpreted by Nuclear Chemistry

Over the past century, numerous models of atomic nuclei have been proposed, each with its strengths and weaknesses. However, no nucleus model based on undefined structures of protons (usually depicted as red balls) and neutrons (usually depicted as blue balls) has succeeded in offering a straightforward predictive tool to unravel the mysteries of fusion and the fission process. A century’s worth of experimental data in nuclear physics should be newly organized. Could there be a lost key to unlocking a deeper understanding of phenomena at femtometer scales? We propose to come back before the bifurcation point in nuclear physics that was defined by Pauli and Fermi with their neutron and neutrino hypothesis in the year 1934. We want to return to the classical nuclei models proposed by early pioneers-Rutherford, Harkins, Landau, and Chadwick-before that decisive year 1934. We propose to develop their models further based on the compound neutron (the composition of proton and electron). Our approach introduces a new view into the nucleus structure and their fusion and fission reactions. The potential of this model will be documented in three interconnected papers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24018/ejphysics.2025.7.1.360
Primary Topic
Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Rutherford-Harkins-Landau-Chadwick Key–II. Fusion Interpreted by Nuclear Chemistry

Jiřı́ Stávek
European Journal of Applied Physics
Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions
article

The Rutherford-Harkins-Landau-Chadwick Key–II. Fusion Interpreted by Nuclear Chemistry

Jiřı́ Stávek
article en

Abstract

Over the past century, numerous models of atomic nuclei have been proposed, each with its strengths and weaknesses. However, no nucleus model based on undefined structures of protons (usually depicted as red balls) and neutrons (usually depicted as blue balls) has succeeded in offering a straightforward predictive tool to unravel the mysteries of fusion and the fission process. A century’s worth of experimental data in nuclear physics should be newly organized. Could there be a lost key to unlocking a deeper understanding of phenomena at femtometer scales? We propose to come back before the bifurcation point in nuclear physics that was defined by Pauli and Fermi with their neutron and neutrino hypothesis in the year 1934. We want to return to the classical nuclei models proposed by early pioneers-Rutherford, Harkins, Landau, and Chadwick-before that decisive year 1934. We propose to develop their models further based on the compound neutron (the composition of proton and electron). Our approach introduces a new view into the nucleus structure and their fusion and fission reactions. The potential of this model will be documented in three interconnected papers.

European Journal of Applied PhysicsVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Rutherford-Harkins-Landau-Chadwick Key–II. Fusion Interpreted by Nuclear Chemistry — Jiřı́ Stávek · European Journal of Applied Physics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS