Accuracy Comparison of Long Short-Term Memory and Linear Regression Methods for Welding Robots Predictive Maintenance

In the manufacturing industry, effective maintenance is required to ensure that the robots function as expected. Maintenance is generally carried out on a scheduled basis, but it is still considered ineffective due to the uneven workload of each piece of equipment. Based on this, a predictive maintenance method was developed based on equipment condition analysis. In this paper, the accuracy of predictive Maintenance in machine learning-based applications using the LR (linear regression) method and the LSTM (long short-term memory) method are compared to predict the remaining useful lifetime (RUL) of the hardware controller of one of the welding robots involved in manufacturing operations at PT. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Indonesia (TMMIN). The accuracy level is based on the mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) values obtained from the results of running the application created for each method. By utilizing equipment operational data for 225 days, it was found that the LSTM method had better accuracy with MAE and MSE of 0.06399 and 0.00806, compared to the LR method, which had MAE and MSE of 0.14476 and 0.02673.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/elticom64085.2024.10865028
Primary Topic
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy Comparison of Long Short-Term Memory and Linear Regression Methods for Welding Robots Predictive Maintenance

Beni Setiawan, Ryandika Afdila, Arie Rafika Dewi, Farhan Khalil Sani et al.
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
article

Accuracy Comparison of Long Short-Term Memory and Linear Regression Methods for Welding Robots Predictive Maintenance

Beni Setiawan, Ryandika Afdila, Arie Rafika Dewi, Farhan Khalil Sani, Arman Sani, Muhammad Najib Razali
article en

Abstract

In the manufacturing industry, effective maintenance is required to ensure that the robots function as expected. Maintenance is generally carried out on a scheduled basis, but it is still considered ineffective due to the uneven workload of each piece of equipment. Based on this, a predictive maintenance method was developed based on equipment condition analysis. In this paper, the accuracy of predictive Maintenance in machine learning-based applications using the LR (linear regression) method and the LSTM (long short-term memory) method are compared to predict the remaining useful lifetime (RUL) of the hardware controller of one of the welding robots involved in manufacturing operations at PT. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Indonesia (TMMIN). The accuracy level is based on the mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) values obtained from the results of running the application created for each method. By utilizing equipment operational data for 225 days, it was found that the LSTM method had better accuracy with MAE and MSE of 0.06399 and 0.00806, compared to the LR method, which had MAE and MSE of 0.14476 and 0.02673.

Pelita Harapan University (ID), Universitas Sumatera Utara (ID), Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia Medan (ID), Universitas Harapan Medan (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accuracy Comparison of Long Short-Term Memory and Linear Regression Methods for Welding Robots Predictive Maintenance — Beni Setiawan, Ryandika Afdila, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS