Top-Performing Photovoltaic Cells Compared to the Shockley–Queisser Limit

Top-performing single-junction and two-terminal tandem devices that include at least one polycrystalline cell are compared with each other and their ideal limits. The parameters of open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current, and fill-factor are individually compared to the Shockley–Queisser limit to investigate where different technologies have room to improve. Technologies, such as silicon and cadmium telluride have the most room for improvement in open-circuit voltage currently utilizing 87% and 81% of their maxima, respectively. Detailed diode and fill-factor loss analysis is presented for single-junction devices to give further insight on how they compare and where efficiency is lost. Single-crystal technologies demonstrate a fill-factor closer to the Shockley–Queisser limit than polycrystalline devices. The high diode quality factor of polycrystalline devices is the leading cause of the decreased fill-factor. Similar analysis on tandem cells with at least one thin-film cell shows that although their efficiency exceeds that of the single-junction cells, the fraction of their ideal efficiency is smaller. By comparing parameters to the Shockley–Queisser limit, it becomes clearer where certain technologies have the potential for improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2025.3533883
Citations
7
Primary Topic
solar cell performance optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Top-Performing Photovoltaic Cells Compared to the Shockley–Queisser Limit

Camden Kasik, Marko Jošt, James R. Sites, Marko Topič et al.
7 citations
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics
solar cell performance optimization
5.11
article

Top-Performing Photovoltaic Cells Compared to the Shockley–Queisser Limit

Camden Kasik, Marko Jošt, James R. Sites, Marko Topič, Ishwor Khatri
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Top-performing single-junction and two-terminal tandem devices that include at least one polycrystalline cell are compared with each other and their ideal limits. The parameters of open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current, and fill-factor are individually compared to the Shockley–Queisser limit to investigate where different technologies have room to improve. Technologies, such as silicon and cadmium telluride have the most room for improvement in open-circuit voltage currently utilizing 87% and 81% of their maxima, respectively. Detailed diode and fill-factor loss analysis is presented for single-junction devices to give further insight on how they compare and where efficiency is lost. Single-crystal technologies demonstrate a fill-factor closer to the Shockley–Queisser limit than polycrystalline devices. The high diode quality factor of polycrystalline devices is the leading cause of the decreased fill-factor. Similar analysis on tandem cells with at least one thin-film cell shows that although their efficiency exceeds that of the single-junction cells, the fraction of their ideal efficiency is smaller. By comparing parameters to the Shockley–Queisser limit, it becomes clearer where certain technologies have the potential for improvement.

IEEE Journal of PhotovoltaicsVol. 15(2)
University of Ljubljana (SI), Colorado State University (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
solar cell performance optimization
5.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Top-Performing Photovoltaic Cells Compared to the Shockley–Queisser Limit — Camden Kasik, Marko Jošt, et al. · IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS