Reconstruction of Breach of Performance & Unlawful Acts in Book III of Civil Law (Islamic Legal Analysis)

This study examines the conceptual differences between default and unlawful acts in Book III of the Civil Code and reconstructs both concepts in the context of Indonesian civil law. In addition, this study analyzes the perspective of Islamic law on the reconstruction carried out. The method used is normative legal research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that default and unlawful acts have fundamental differences, where default arises due to a violation of an agreement, while unlawful acts are based on a violation of rights or legal norms. Book III of the Civil Code has provided a clear legal framework related to these two concepts, although in practice it still needs to be strengthened in implementation and adaptation to social developments. The reconstruction carried out in this study confirms that Indonesian civil law continues to develop in accordance with the dynamics of society. From an Islamic legal perspective, the principles of justice, individual responsibility, and good faith in transactions have strong relevance in understanding default and unlawful acts. This study contributes to the development of civil law theory and practice in Indonesia and enriches the study of Islamic law in the context of modern civil law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Akta
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i1.43725
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstruction of Breach of Performance & Unlawful Acts in Book III of Civil Law (Islamic Legal Analysis)

M. Amar Adly, Muhammad Syukri Albani, Dedi Ismanto
Jurnal Akta
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Reconstruction of Breach of Performance & Unlawful Acts in Book III of Civil Law (Islamic Legal Analysis)

M. Amar Adly, Muhammad Syukri Albani, Dedi Ismanto
article en

Abstract

This study examines the conceptual differences between default and unlawful acts in Book III of the Civil Code and reconstructs both concepts in the context of Indonesian civil law. In addition, this study analyzes the perspective of Islamic law on the reconstruction carried out. The method used is normative legal research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that default and unlawful acts have fundamental differences, where default arises due to a violation of an agreement, while unlawful acts are based on a violation of rights or legal norms. Book III of the Civil Code has provided a clear legal framework related to these two concepts, although in practice it still needs to be strengthened in implementation and adaptation to social developments. The reconstruction carried out in this study confirms that Indonesian civil law continues to develop in accordance with the dynamics of society. From an Islamic legal perspective, the principles of justice, individual responsibility, and good faith in transactions have strong relevance in understanding default and unlawful acts. This study contributes to the development of civil law theory and practice in Indonesia and enriches the study of Islamic law in the context of modern civil law.

Jurnal AktaVol. 12(1)
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.