Structural synaptic signatures of contextual memory retrieval-reactivated hippocampal engram cells

Learning enhances hippocampal engram cell synaptic connectivity which is crucial for engram reactivation and recall to natural cues. Memory retrieval engages only a subset of the learning-activated ensemble, indicating potential differences in synaptic connectivity signatures of reactivated and non-reactivated cells. We probed these differences in structural synaptic connectivity patterns after recent memory retrieval, 72 h after either neutral Context Exploration (CE) or aversive Contextual Fear Conditioning (CFC). Using a combination of eGRASP (enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) reconstitution across synaptic partners) and viral-TRAP (targeted recombination in activated populations) to label CA3 synapses onto CA1 engram cells, we investigated differences in spine density, clusters, and morphology between the reactivated and non-reactivated population of the learning ensemble. In doing so, we developed a pipeline for reconstruction and analysis of dendrites and spines, taking nested data structure into account. Our data demonstrate an interplay between reactivation status, context valence or both factors on the number, distribution, and morphology of CA1 engram cell synapses. Despite a lack of differences in spine density, reactivated engram cells encoding an aversive context were characterised by a higher probability of forming spine clusters and a more dynamic spine type signature compared to their non-reactivated counterparts or engram cells encoding a neutral context. Together, our data indicate that the learning-activated ensemble undergoes different trajectories in structural synaptic connectivity during engram refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2025.108033
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural synaptic signatures of contextual memory retrieval-reactivated hippocampal engram cells

Priyanka Rao‐Ruiz, Michel C. van den Oever, August Benjamin Smit, Sabine Spijker et al.
4 citations
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
3.64
article

Structural synaptic signatures of contextual memory retrieval-reactivated hippocampal engram cells

Priyanka Rao‐Ruiz, Michel C. van den Oever, August Benjamin Smit, Sabine Spijker, Panthea Nemat, Rolinka J. van der Loo, Salimat Semenova
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Learning enhances hippocampal engram cell synaptic connectivity which is crucial for engram reactivation and recall to natural cues. Memory retrieval engages only a subset of the learning-activated ensemble, indicating potential differences in synaptic connectivity signatures of reactivated and non-reactivated cells. We probed these differences in structural synaptic connectivity patterns after recent memory retrieval, 72 h after either neutral Context Exploration (CE) or aversive Contextual Fear Conditioning (CFC). Using a combination of eGRASP (enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) reconstitution across synaptic partners) and viral-TRAP (targeted recombination in activated populations) to label CA3 synapses onto CA1 engram cells, we investigated differences in spine density, clusters, and morphology between the reactivated and non-reactivated population of the learning ensemble. In doing so, we developed a pipeline for reconstruction and analysis of dendrites and spines, taking nested data structure into account. Our data demonstrate an interplay between reactivation status, context valence or both factors on the number, distribution, and morphology of CA1 engram cell synapses. Despite a lack of differences in spine density, reactivated engram cells encoding an aversive context were characterised by a higher probability of forming spine clusters and a more dynamic spine type signature compared to their non-reactivated counterparts or engram cells encoding a neutral context. Together, our data indicate that the learning-activated ensemble undergoes different trajectories in structural synaptic connectivity during engram refinement.

Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryVol. 218
Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Cognitive Research (United States) (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
3.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.