An asymmetric volatility analysis of the negative oil price during the first COVID-19 wave

For the first time ever, oil futures were negatively priced on April 20, 2020. We modify an investment model to fit the financial markets context of information processing and arrival. It is able to explain a negative price dip. Its joint interpretation with estimates from GARCH models captures some central institutional setups of the market. We show not only storage uncertainty, in particular, due to the pandemic, but especially noise induced by non-cash settlement in combination with financialization to lie at the heart of the threshold-like leverage effect. To avoid negative pricing and collusive behavior, freeriding on this leverage effect, either the possibility of cash settlement or the abolition of hedging trade-at-settlement contracts can be considered by regulators. • Theoretical rationalization of price drop of crude oil futures into the negative. • Empirical models of GARCH class find indications of asymmetric volatility. • Leverage is non-exponential threshold-like indicating manipulative behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Financial Analysis
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103959
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An asymmetric volatility analysis of the negative oil price during the first COVID-19 wave

Bernd Süßmuth, Carolin Birnstengel
1 citations
International Review of Financial Analysis
Market Dynamics and Volatility
3.13
article

An asymmetric volatility analysis of the negative oil price during the first COVID-19 wave

Bernd Süßmuth, Carolin Birnstengel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For the first time ever, oil futures were negatively priced on April 20, 2020. We modify an investment model to fit the financial markets context of information processing and arrival. It is able to explain a negative price dip. Its joint interpretation with estimates from GARCH models captures some central institutional setups of the market. We show not only storage uncertainty, in particular, due to the pandemic, but especially noise induced by non-cash settlement in combination with financialization to lie at the heart of the threshold-like leverage effect. To avoid negative pricing and collusive behavior, freeriding on this leverage effect, either the possibility of cash settlement or the abolition of hedging trade-at-settlement contracts can be considered by regulators. • Theoretical rationalization of price drop of crude oil futures into the negative. • Empirical models of GARCH class find indications of asymmetric volatility. • Leverage is non-exponential threshold-like indicating manipulative behavior.

International Review of Financial AnalysisVol. 100
Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An asymmetric volatility analysis of the negative oil price during the first COVID-19 wave — Bernd Süßmuth, Carolin Birnstengel · International Review of Financial Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS