REPAC

This essay presents a framework of critical questions designed to guide EdD program leaders and faculty in integrating generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into their curricula and policies. The REPAC framework aids in reflecting, reenvisioning, and redesigning educational practices to better incorporate GenAI, focusing on how candidates learn with and about AI tools. These questions ensure that program transformations are evaluated through equity, ethics, and justice lenses. Moreover, they provide a foundation for revising policies and practices, developing new guidelines, and promoting innovative AI use while upholding academic integrity. Authored by faculty from three institutions, this framework includes scenarios that illustrate the educational potential and impact of GenAI, scaffolding the decision-making process and fostering an understanding of AI tools in EdD programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Impacting Education Journal on Transforming Professional Practice
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.469
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REPAC

Paula Cristina Azevedo, Stephanie Smith Budhai, Clara Hauth, Elizabeth Langran et al.
1 citations
Impacting Education Journal on Transforming Professional Practice
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

REPAC

Paula Cristina Azevedo, Stephanie Smith Budhai, Clara Hauth, Elizabeth Langran, Oliver Dreon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This essay presents a framework of critical questions designed to guide EdD program leaders and faculty in integrating generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into their curricula and policies. The REPAC framework aids in reflecting, reenvisioning, and redesigning educational practices to better incorporate GenAI, focusing on how candidates learn with and about AI tools. These questions ensure that program transformations are evaluated through equity, ethics, and justice lenses. Moreover, they provide a foundation for revising policies and practices, developing new guidelines, and promoting innovative AI use while upholding academic integrity. Authored by faculty from three institutions, this framework includes scenarios that illustrate the educational potential and impact of GenAI, scaffolding the decision-making process and fostering an understanding of AI tools in EdD programs.

Impacting Education Journal on Transforming Professional PracticeVol. 10(1)
Millersville University (US), Marymount University (US), University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

REPAC — Paula Cristina Azevedo, Stephanie Smith Budhai, et al. · Impacting Education Journal on Transforming Professional Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS