Use of failure mode and effect analysis to improve the monoclonal antibody drugs management process in pharmacy intravenous admixture services

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) constitute a new form of immunotherapy that has shown great success in long-term tumour control. These injectable drugs are managed and compounded by the Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services (PIVAS) staff in a specified sterile environment. This study utilized failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) as a risk management tool to manage mAb drugs within the PIVAS. The nine-member multidisciplinary team mapped the processes; evaluated the severity, occurrence, and detection of each subprocess; and calculated the risk priority number (RPN). Further corrective actions were taken for high-risk steps, followed by re-evaluation and scoring to achieve a low-risk process. We identified seven major processes and twenty-eight subprocesses involved in the management of mAb drugs in PIVAS. A total of thirteen high-risk failure modes with an assigned RPN 1 were selected. This selection represents the first calculated RPN values, resulting in a total score of 3375. After a first round of evaluation and implementation of corrective actions, the RPN 2 score decreased to 464. Following a second round of the FMEA process, the RPN 3 score was further reduced to 51. Through refinement, we successfully mitigated the occurrence of high-risk failure modes of mAb drugs in PIVAS. These efforts are aimed at enhancing the safety and efficacy of mAb drugs, ultimately ensuring patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89145-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of failure mode and effect analysis to improve the monoclonal antibody drugs management process in pharmacy intravenous admixture services

Chunxiao Lu, Shuai Lü, Wei Xie, M Li et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
11.55
article

Use of failure mode and effect analysis to improve the monoclonal antibody drugs management process in pharmacy intravenous admixture services

Chunxiao Lu, Shuai Lü, Wei Xie, M Li, Guojun Jiang, Jianjun Zhu, Dan Shen, Jian Cai
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) constitute a new form of immunotherapy that has shown great success in long-term tumour control. These injectable drugs are managed and compounded by the Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services (PIVAS) staff in a specified sterile environment. This study utilized failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) as a risk management tool to manage mAb drugs within the PIVAS. The nine-member multidisciplinary team mapped the processes; evaluated the severity, occurrence, and detection of each subprocess; and calculated the risk priority number (RPN). Further corrective actions were taken for high-risk steps, followed by re-evaluation and scoring to achieve a low-risk process. We identified seven major processes and twenty-eight subprocesses involved in the management of mAb drugs in PIVAS. A total of thirteen high-risk failure modes with an assigned RPN 1 were selected. This selection represents the first calculated RPN values, resulting in a total score of 3375. After a first round of evaluation and implementation of corrective actions, the RPN 2 score decreased to 464. Following a second round of the FMEA process, the RPN 3 score was further reduced to 51. Through refinement, we successfully mitigated the occurrence of high-risk failure modes of mAb drugs in PIVAS. These efforts are aimed at enhancing the safety and efficacy of mAb drugs, ultimately ensuring patient safety.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Hangzhou Xixi hospital (CN), The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
11.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.