Understanding the uneven use of rental e-scooters and implications for equity: Evidence from England’s largest e-scooter trial

• This analysis explores the socially uneven use of shared e-scooters across Bristol. • More e-scooter trips come from areas with larger shares of young or black residents. • Fewer e-scooter trips originate from areas of greater deprivation in Bristol. • These results have mixed implications for policy and reducing transport poverty. The availability and adoption of rental e-scooter services, proliferating in cities globally, are spatially and socially uneven. Studies suggest that a majority of users in North American and European cities are men with higher incomes and more education than the average. The use of shared e-scooters by sociodemographic groups that are more likely to have access to a car and a wide range of opportunities raises questions as to whether this new transport technology entrenches inequalities. However, few studies focus on e-scooter use in England, where only shared e-scooters permitted and regulated by the UK’s Department for Transport alongside relevant local governments on a trial basis are legal for travel on the public highway. These services were therefore often introduced to achieve policy objectives, and the government commissioned a national evaluation of the e-scooter trials in English cities to understand their impacts. The evaluation report suggests they are popular among low-income and minority ethnic riders, but highlights the need for further study, such as the one presented here. This article uses a transport poverty framing and a dataset of 3.6 million e-scooter trips taken over 13 months in Bristol to investigate the uneven sociodemographic and spatial patterns of rental e-scooter use. We find that, holding all else equal, more e-scooter trips are taken from areas with larger shares of younger (under 35), black and Asian individuals. However, there are fewer e-scooter trip origins from areas of greater deprivation in Bristol. This suggests that while younger, Black, and Asian populations may be more likely to adopt or have access to e-scooters as a mode of transport, fewer e-scooter trips from areas of greater deprivation indicate potential barriers to access or adoption in these communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies on Transport Policy
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101392
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the uneven use of rental e-scooters and implications for equity: Evidence from England’s largest e-scooter trial

Tim Schwanen, Hannah Budnitz, Xiao Li, Helen Morrissey
Case Studies on Transport Policy
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Understanding the uneven use of rental e-scooters and implications for equity: Evidence from England’s largest e-scooter trial

Tim Schwanen, Hannah Budnitz, Xiao Li, Helen Morrissey
article en

Abstract

• This analysis explores the socially uneven use of shared e-scooters across Bristol. • More e-scooter trips come from areas with larger shares of young or black residents. • Fewer e-scooter trips originate from areas of greater deprivation in Bristol. • These results have mixed implications for policy and reducing transport poverty. The availability and adoption of rental e-scooter services, proliferating in cities globally, are spatially and socially uneven. Studies suggest that a majority of users in North American and European cities are men with higher incomes and more education than the average. The use of shared e-scooters by sociodemographic groups that are more likely to have access to a car and a wide range of opportunities raises questions as to whether this new transport technology entrenches inequalities. However, few studies focus on e-scooter use in England, where only shared e-scooters permitted and regulated by the UK’s Department for Transport alongside relevant local governments on a trial basis are legal for travel on the public highway. These services were therefore often introduced to achieve policy objectives, and the government commissioned a national evaluation of the e-scooter trials in English cities to understand their impacts. The evaluation report suggests they are popular among low-income and minority ethnic riders, but highlights the need for further study, such as the one presented here. This article uses a transport poverty framing and a dataset of 3.6 million e-scooter trips taken over 13 months in Bristol to investigate the uneven sociodemographic and spatial patterns of rental e-scooter use. We find that, holding all else equal, more e-scooter trips are taken from areas with larger shares of younger (under 35), black and Asian individuals. However, there are fewer e-scooter trip origins from areas of greater deprivation in Bristol. This suggests that while younger, Black, and Asian populations may be more likely to adopt or have access to e-scooters as a mode of transport, fewer e-scooter trips from areas of greater deprivation indicate potential barriers to access or adoption in these communities.

Case Studies on Transport PolicyVol. 19
University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.