Designing LLM Chains by Adapting Techniques from Crowdsourcing Workflows

LLM chains enable complex tasks by decomposing work into a sequence of subtasks. Similarly, the more established techniques of crowdsourcing workflows decompose complex tasks into smaller tasks for human crowdworkers. Chains address LLM errors analogously to the way crowdsourcing workflows address human error. To characterize opportunities for LLM chaining, we survey 107 papers across the crowdsourcing and chaining literature to construct a design space for chain development. The design space covers a designer’s objectives and the tactics used to build workflows. We then surface strategies that mediate how workflows use tactics to achieve objectives. To explore how techniques from crowdsourcing may apply to chaining, we adapt crowdsourcing workflows to implement LLM chains across three case studies: creating a taxonomy, shortening text, and writing a short story. From the design space and our case studies, we identify takeaways for effective chain design and raise implications for future research and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3716134
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing LLM Chains by Adapting Techniques from Crowdsourcing Workflows

Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Ranjay Krishna, Daniel S. Weld, Jeffrey Heer et al.
7 citations
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
15.99
article

Designing LLM Chains by Adapting Techniques from Crowdsourcing Workflows

Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Ranjay Krishna, Daniel S. Weld, Jeffrey Heer, Michelle S. Lam
article en
7 citations

Abstract

LLM chains enable complex tasks by decomposing work into a sequence of subtasks. Similarly, the more established techniques of crowdsourcing workflows decompose complex tasks into smaller tasks for human crowdworkers. Chains address LLM errors analogously to the way crowdsourcing workflows address human error. To characterize opportunities for LLM chaining, we survey 107 papers across the crowdsourcing and chaining literature to construct a design space for chain development. The design space covers a designer’s objectives and the tactics used to build workflows. We then surface strategies that mediate how workflows use tactics to achieve objectives. To explore how techniques from crowdsourcing may apply to chaining, we adapt crowdsourcing workflows to implement LLM chains across three case studies: creating a taxonomy, shortening text, and writing a short story. From the design space and our case studies, we identify takeaways for effective chain design and raise implications for future research and development.

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractionVol. 32(3)
University of Washington (US), Allen Institute (US), Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
15.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.