Validez y fiabilidad de la escala de participación de niños y adolescentes (CASP): una revisión sistemática

Introduction: Participation is defined as voluntary involvement in everyday life situations. The Child and Adolescent Participation Scale (CASP) has been used to assess this construct, with its validity and reliability reported in various countries. Objective: This study analyzed the validity and reliability of the CASP scale, identifying its strengths and limitations. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted using the databases PubMed, Epistemonikos, Scopus, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, Wiley, LILACS, and WOS. Studies published between 2011 and 2023 were included. Results: The findings showed high ratings in aspects such as comprehensibility, relevance, and completeness, along with adequate internal consistency and intra- and interclass correlation. A positive correlation was also found with other instruments, such as the Child and Adolescent Factors Inventory (CAFI). Conclusions: The scale demonstrates strong psychometric properties. However, adjustments are needed to actively include infants and young people and to adapt the scale to diverse contexts, considering sociocultural, economic, educational, and labor factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Retos
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v64.109651
Primary Topic
Educational Practices and Sociocultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validez y fiabilidad de la escala de participación de niños y adolescentes (CASP): una revisión sistemática

Ana Marcela Bolaños Roldán, Elizabeth Roldán González, Lina Giccela Suárez Muñoz, P. Marín et al.
Retos
Educational Practices and Sociocultural Research
article

Validez y fiabilidad de la escala de participación de niños y adolescentes (CASP): una revisión sistemática

Ana Marcela Bolaños Roldán, Elizabeth Roldán González, Lina Giccela Suárez Muñoz, P. Marín, Andry Yasmid Mera Mamián
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Participation is defined as voluntary involvement in everyday life situations. The Child and Adolescent Participation Scale (CASP) has been used to assess this construct, with its validity and reliability reported in various countries. Objective: This study analyzed the validity and reliability of the CASP scale, identifying its strengths and limitations. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted using the databases PubMed, Epistemonikos, Scopus, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, Wiley, LILACS, and WOS. Studies published between 2011 and 2023 were included. Results: The findings showed high ratings in aspects such as comprehensibility, relevance, and completeness, along with adequate internal consistency and intra- and interclass correlation. A positive correlation was also found with other instruments, such as the Child and Adolescent Factors Inventory (CAFI). Conclusions: The scale demonstrates strong psychometric properties. However, adjustments are needed to actively include infants and young people and to adapt the scale to diverse contexts, considering sociocultural, economic, educational, and labor factors.

RetosVol. 64
Fundación Universitaria María Cano (CO), Clínica CES (CO), Universidad del Valle (CO)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Educational Practices and Sociocultural Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.