Ethical issues and violations in using chatbots in academic writing and publishing: the answers from ChatGPT

Chatbots have become widespread in recent years and are used into various domains, including academic writing and publishing. However, concerns have emerged regarding some possible ethical issues and breaches associated with their application. Examples have been identified where chatbots have started to replace human authors in academia, emphasizing concerns about authorship authenticity and research integrity, especially in terms of ethics. Furthermore, the reliability of chatbots is debatable, as some may yield misleading or incorrect results, weakening the credibility of academic work. Therefore, based on the ethical violations framework derived from the literature, this study, therefore, poses ten inquiries to ChatGPT concerning ethical standards for the use of chatbots in academic writing and publishing as well as its limits of the usage. The findings underscore ongoing discourse and consciousness surrounding the ethical considerations inherent in applying chatbots within academic writing and publishing realms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31822/jomat.2025-10-1-111
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical issues and violations in using chatbots in academic writing and publishing: the answers from ChatGPT

Eren ERKILIÇ, İbrahim Çifçi
Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Ethical issues and violations in using chatbots in academic writing and publishing: the answers from ChatGPT

Eren ERKILIÇ, İbrahim Çifçi
article en

Abstract

Chatbots have become widespread in recent years and are used into various domains, including academic writing and publishing. However, concerns have emerged regarding some possible ethical issues and breaches associated with their application. Examples have been identified where chatbots have started to replace human authors in academia, emphasizing concerns about authorship authenticity and research integrity, especially in terms of ethics. Furthermore, the reliability of chatbots is debatable, as some may yield misleading or incorrect results, weakening the credibility of academic work. Therefore, based on the ethical violations framework derived from the literature, this study, therefore, poses ten inquiries to ChatGPT concerning ethical standards for the use of chatbots in academic writing and publishing as well as its limits of the usage. The findings underscore ongoing discourse and consciousness surrounding the ethical considerations inherent in applying chatbots within academic writing and publishing realms.

Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic TourismVol. 10(1)
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.