Towards Best-Practice Healthcare for Transgender Patients: Quality Improvement in United Kingdom General Practice

<b>Introduction:</b> The ongoing care of transgender patients in United Kingdom (UK) general practice (GP) is hampered by a lack of UK primary care guidelines regarding the monitoring of treatments, despite the key role that general practice has in holistic lifelong care. This quality improvement project aimed to audit the monitoring of treatments and health screening in a GP practice population, across two large practices in southwest England, in order to drive local improvement and to identify gaps in wider healthcare support for this population. <b>Methods:</b> This project updated a previously published audit instrument, incorporating a novel, pragmatic standard, based on up-to-date UK gender clinic guidelines and the UK population screening programmes. National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority and Medical Research Council processes were used to confirm that this quality improvement project did not require formal ethics committee approval. An audit against this standard was performed for 176 transgender and gender-minority patients, to provide data on the consistency of the monitoring of gender hormonal treatments and reminders for appropriate population health screening programmes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 16% of those undergoing hormonal treatments had received optimal monitoring; 20% were missing the most basic hormone level monitoring. Reminders regarding appropriate health screening were rare in patients who had changed the gender markers on their electronic record. Long waiting lists, the use of private clinics, confusion around responsibilities shared between primary and secondary care and growing complex co-morbidity were demonstrated. <b>Conclusions:</b> This project supports previous calls for consistent evidence-based guidelines, improved data systems and adequately resourced primary and secondary care services to support the safe and effective lifelong care of transgender patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13040353
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Best-Practice Healthcare for Transgender Patients: Quality Improvement in United Kingdom General Practice

Alexandra Martin, C Silver, Joanne E Butterworth, Rebecca Calvey
Healthcare
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Towards Best-Practice Healthcare for Transgender Patients: Quality Improvement in United Kingdom General Practice

Alexandra Martin, C Silver, Joanne E Butterworth, Rebecca Calvey
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> The ongoing care of transgender patients in United Kingdom (UK) general practice (GP) is hampered by a lack of UK primary care guidelines regarding the monitoring of treatments, despite the key role that general practice has in holistic lifelong care. This quality improvement project aimed to audit the monitoring of treatments and health screening in a GP practice population, across two large practices in southwest England, in order to drive local improvement and to identify gaps in wider healthcare support for this population. <b>Methods:</b> This project updated a previously published audit instrument, incorporating a novel, pragmatic standard, based on up-to-date UK gender clinic guidelines and the UK population screening programmes. National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority and Medical Research Council processes were used to confirm that this quality improvement project did not require formal ethics committee approval. An audit against this standard was performed for 176 transgender and gender-minority patients, to provide data on the consistency of the monitoring of gender hormonal treatments and reminders for appropriate population health screening programmes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 16% of those undergoing hormonal treatments had received optimal monitoring; 20% were missing the most basic hormone level monitoring. Reminders regarding appropriate health screening were rare in patients who had changed the gender markers on their electronic record. Long waiting lists, the use of private clinics, confusion around responsibilities shared between primary and secondary care and growing complex co-morbidity were demonstrated. <b>Conclusions:</b> This project supports previous calls for consistent evidence-based guidelines, improved data systems and adequately resourced primary and secondary care services to support the safe and effective lifelong care of transgender patients.

HealthcareVol. 13(4)
University of Exeter (GB), Exmouth Hospital (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.