Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra-resistant and MTBDR <i>plus-</i> susceptible rifampicin results in people with tuberculosis: utility of FluoroType MTBDR and deep sequencing
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra)-detected rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is often programmatically confirmed using MTBDR<i>plus</i>. There are limited data on discordant results, including when re-tested using newer methods, like FluoroType MTBDR (FT-MTBDR) and targeted deep sequencing. MTBDR<i>plus</i> rifampicin-susceptible isolates from people with Ultra rifampicin-resistant sputum were identified from a South African programmatic laboratory. FT-MTBDR and single molecule-overlapping reads (SMOR; <i>rpoB</i>, <i>inhA</i>, <i>katG</i>) on isolate DNA were done (SMOR was used as a reference standard). Between 1 April 2021 and 30 September 2022, 8% (109/1347) of Ultra rifampicin-resistant specimens were MTBDR<i>plus</i>-susceptible. Of 89% (97/109) isolates with a sequenceable <i>rpoB</i>, SMOR resolved most in favor of Ultra (79% [77/97]). Sputum with lower mycobacterial load was associated with Ultra false-positive resistance (46% [11/24] of "very low" Ultra had false resistance vs 12% [9/73; <i>P</i> = 0.0004] of ≥"low"), as were Ultra heteroresistance calls (all wild-type probes, ≥1 mutant probe) (62% [23/37 vs 25% 15/60] for Ultra without heteroresistance calls; <i>P</i> = 0.0003). Of the 91% (88/97) of isolates successfully tested by FT-MTBDR, 55% (48/88) were FT-MTBDR rifampicin-resistant and 45% (40/88) susceptible, translating to 69% (47/68) sensitivity and 95% (19/20) specificity. In the 91% (99/109) of isolates with <i>inhA</i> and <i>katG</i> sequenced, 62% (61/99) were SMOR isoniazid-susceptible. When Ultra and MTBDR<i>plus</i> rifampicin results are discordant, Ultra is more likely to be correct, and FT-MTBDR agrees more with Ultra than MTBDR<i>plus</i>; however, lower load and the Ultra heteroresistance probe pattern were risk factors for Ultra false rifampicin-resistant results. Most people with Ultra-MTBDR<i>plus</i> discordant resistance results were isoniazid-susceptible. These data have implications for drug-resistant TB diagnosis.
Authors
- Fahd Naufal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6106-3177)
- Robin M. Warren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5741-7358)
- Christoffel J. Opperman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6676-5431)
- John Metcalfe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2279-7036)
- Yonas Ghebrekristos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2002-5240)
- Megan Folkerts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7430-1701)
- Erick Auma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-4944)
- Natalie Beylis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1860-6345)
- David M. Engelthaler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-059X)
- Sarishna Singh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-4126)
- Grant Theron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9216-2415)
- Ghowa Booley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5017-5576)
- Rouxjeane Venter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-8166)
- Aysha Ahmed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1014-5104)
Institutions
- National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
- South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
- Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Published
- 2025-02-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01671-24
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.19
Funders
- European Commission
- South African Medical Research Council
- Universiteit Stellenbosch
- National Institutes of Health
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
- Medical Research Council
- H2020 Public-public partnerships
- European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership