Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra-resistant and MTBDR <i>plus-</i> susceptible rifampicin results in people with tuberculosis: utility of FluoroType MTBDR and deep sequencing

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra)-detected rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is often programmatically confirmed using MTBDR<i>plus</i>. There are limited data on discordant results, including when re-tested using newer methods, like FluoroType MTBDR (FT-MTBDR) and targeted deep sequencing. MTBDR<i>plus</i> rifampicin-susceptible isolates from people with Ultra rifampicin-resistant sputum were identified from a South African programmatic laboratory. FT-MTBDR and single molecule-overlapping reads (SMOR; <i>rpoB</i>, <i>inhA</i>, <i>katG</i>) on isolate DNA were done (SMOR was used as a reference standard). Between 1 April 2021 and 30 September 2022, 8% (109/1347) of Ultra rifampicin-resistant specimens were MTBDR<i>plus</i>-susceptible. Of 89% (97/109) isolates with a sequenceable <i>rpoB</i>, SMOR resolved most in favor of Ultra (79% [77/97]). Sputum with lower mycobacterial load was associated with Ultra false-positive resistance (46% [11/24] of "very low" Ultra had false resistance vs 12% [9/73; <i>P</i> = 0.0004] of ≥"low"), as were Ultra heteroresistance calls (all wild-type probes, ≥1 mutant probe) (62% [23/37 vs 25% 15/60] for Ultra without heteroresistance calls; <i>P</i> = 0.0003). Of the 91% (88/97) of isolates successfully tested by FT-MTBDR, 55% (48/88) were FT-MTBDR rifampicin-resistant and 45% (40/88) susceptible, translating to 69% (47/68) sensitivity and 95% (19/20) specificity. In the 91% (99/109) of isolates with <i>inhA</i> and <i>katG</i> sequenced, 62% (61/99) were SMOR isoniazid-susceptible. When Ultra and MTBDR<i>plus</i> rifampicin results are discordant, Ultra is more likely to be correct, and FT-MTBDR agrees more with Ultra than MTBDR<i>plus</i>; however, lower load and the Ultra heteroresistance probe pattern were risk factors for Ultra false rifampicin-resistant results. Most people with Ultra-MTBDR<i>plus</i> discordant resistance results were isoniazid-susceptible. These data have implications for drug-resistant TB diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01671-24
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra-resistant and MTBDR plus- susceptible rifampicin results in people with tuberculosis: utility of FluoroType MTBDR and deep sequencing

Fahd Naufal, Robin M. Warren, Christoffel J. Opperman, John Metcalfe et al.
3 citations
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
4.19
article

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra-resistant and MTBDR plus- susceptible rifampicin results in people with tuberculosis: utility of FluoroType MTBDR and deep sequencing

Fahd Naufal, Robin M. Warren, Christoffel J. Opperman, John Metcalfe, Yonas Ghebrekristos, Megan Folkerts, Erick Auma, Natalie Beylis, David M. Engelthaler, Sarishna Singh, Grant Theron, Ghowa Booley, Rouxjeane Venter, Aysha Ahmed
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra)-detected rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is often programmatically confirmed using MTBDR<i>plus</i>. There are limited data on discordant results, including when re-tested using newer methods, like FluoroType MTBDR (FT-MTBDR) and targeted deep sequencing. MTBDR<i>plus</i> rifampicin-susceptible isolates from people with Ultra rifampicin-resistant sputum were identified from a South African programmatic laboratory. FT-MTBDR and single molecule-overlapping reads (SMOR; <i>rpoB</i>, <i>inhA</i>, <i>katG</i>) on isolate DNA were done (SMOR was used as a reference standard). Between 1 April 2021 and 30 September 2022, 8% (109/1347) of Ultra rifampicin-resistant specimens were MTBDR<i>plus</i>-susceptible. Of 89% (97/109) isolates with a sequenceable <i>rpoB</i>, SMOR resolved most in favor of Ultra (79% [77/97]). Sputum with lower mycobacterial load was associated with Ultra false-positive resistance (46% [11/24] of "very low" Ultra had false resistance vs 12% [9/73; <i>P</i> = 0.0004] of ≥"low"), as were Ultra heteroresistance calls (all wild-type probes, ≥1 mutant probe) (62% [23/37 vs 25% 15/60] for Ultra without heteroresistance calls; <i>P</i> = 0.0003). Of the 91% (88/97) of isolates successfully tested by FT-MTBDR, 55% (48/88) were FT-MTBDR rifampicin-resistant and 45% (40/88) susceptible, translating to 69% (47/68) sensitivity and 95% (19/20) specificity. In the 91% (99/109) of isolates with <i>inhA</i> and <i>katG</i> sequenced, 62% (61/99) were SMOR isoniazid-susceptible. When Ultra and MTBDR<i>plus</i> rifampicin results are discordant, Ultra is more likely to be correct, and FT-MTBDR agrees more with Ultra than MTBDR<i>plus</i>; however, lower load and the Ultra heteroresistance probe pattern were risk factors for Ultra false rifampicin-resistant results. Most people with Ultra-MTBDR<i>plus</i> discordant resistance results were isoniazid-susceptible. These data have implications for drug-resistant TB diagnosis.

Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyVol. 69(3)
National Health Laboratory Service (ZA), South African Medical Research Council (ZA), Translational Genomics Research Institute (US), University of Cape Town (ZA), University of California, San Francisco (US), Stellenbosch University (ZA), South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (ZA)
European Commission, South African Medical Research Council, Universiteit Stellenbosch, National Institutes of Health, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Medical Research Council, H2020 Public-public partnerships, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.