Evaluating the Suitability of Inception Score and Fréchet Inception Distance as Metrics for Quality and Diversity in Image Generation

Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) have gained popularity as one of the main approaches for generating diverse and high-quality synthetic images. This study examines the suitability of evaluation metrics, specifically Inception Score and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), for assessing these images. Particularly, the study focuses on the generation of synthetic images based on the MNIST handwritten digits dataset. Through the use of VAE-generated MNIST image samples, the study analyses the abovementioned metrics alongside alternative methods that can be used to assess image quality and diversity. The findings made from the study reveal the strengths and limitations of each metric in evaluating image quality and diversity. This paper underscores the need for tailored metrics to enhance the evaluation of generative models, while specifically using the performance of a VAE as the domain of investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3708778.3708790
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Suitability of Inception Score and Fréchet Inception Distance as Metrics for Quality and Diversity in Image Generation

Daniel Chan, Siphesihle Sithungu
10 citations
Advanced Image Processing Techniques
2.49
article

Evaluating the Suitability of Inception Score and Fréchet Inception Distance as Metrics for Quality and Diversity in Image Generation

Daniel Chan, Siphesihle Sithungu
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) have gained popularity as one of the main approaches for generating diverse and high-quality synthetic images. This study examines the suitability of evaluation metrics, specifically Inception Score and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), for assessing these images. Particularly, the study focuses on the generation of synthetic images based on the MNIST handwritten digits dataset. Through the use of VAE-generated MNIST image samples, the study analyses the abovementioned metrics alongside alternative methods that can be used to assess image quality and diversity. The findings made from the study reveal the strengths and limitations of each metric in evaluating image quality and diversity. This paper underscores the need for tailored metrics to enhance the evaluation of generative models, while specifically using the performance of a VAE as the domain of investigation.

University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Image Processing Techniques
2.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.