Public Pensions Need Actuarial Analysis to Understand Their Capacity for Illiquid Assets

This article shows how actuarial factors influence the ability of public pension funds to invest in illiquid assets using a stress testing approach with asset/liability modeling. We find that one of the most critical characteristics influencing the ability to invest in illiquid assets is plan funding. The more quickly and aggressively a pension fund increases contributions in response to market downturns, the greater its capacity for investing in illiquid assets. We also analyze the impact of the liability maturity, such as the level of benefit payments, and find it to have a smaller, though still significant, impact. We further explore the interaction between funding and plan maturity, finding that the combination of weak funding and a mature liability causes the greatest challenges for liquidity. Then we explore how this analysis could be adapted for investor types such as corporate pension funds, endowments, and foundations. Without such actuarial analysis, many institutional investors cannot have a full understanding of how much illiquidity their portfolios can handle, and thus risk suboptimal portfolio construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Alternative Investments
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2025.1.234
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Pensions Need Actuarial Analysis to Understand Their Capacity for Illiquid Assets

J.J. Sullivan, Eli A. Friedman
The Journal of Alternative Investments
Global Health Care Issues
article

Public Pensions Need Actuarial Analysis to Understand Their Capacity for Illiquid Assets

J.J. Sullivan, Eli A. Friedman
article en

Abstract

This article shows how actuarial factors influence the ability of public pension funds to invest in illiquid assets using a stress testing approach with asset/liability modeling. We find that one of the most critical characteristics influencing the ability to invest in illiquid assets is plan funding. The more quickly and aggressively a pension fund increases contributions in response to market downturns, the greater its capacity for investing in illiquid assets. We also analyze the impact of the liability maturity, such as the level of benefit payments, and find it to have a smaller, though still significant, impact. We further explore the interaction between funding and plan maturity, finding that the combination of weak funding and a mature liability causes the greatest challenges for liquidity. Then we explore how this analysis could be adapted for investor types such as corporate pension funds, endowments, and foundations. Without such actuarial analysis, many institutional investors cannot have a full understanding of how much illiquidity their portfolios can handle, and thus risk suboptimal portfolio construction.

The Journal of Alternative Investments
Fidelity Investments (United States) (US), American Indian Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Global Health Care Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public Pensions Need Actuarial Analysis to Understand Their Capacity for Illiquid Assets — J.J. Sullivan, Eli A. Friedman · The Journal of Alternative Investments (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS