Applicability of the in vitro skin irritation methods (EpiSkin™, EpiDerm™ SIT) to organosilicon-based substances

It is now widely accepted that the reconstructed human epidermis models (OECD TG 439) can be used as a standalone replacement of the in vivo rabbit assay (OECD TG 404) to accurately predict skin irritancy. Many legislations have now introduced the legal requirement to use in vitro methods as the first step. The applicability of these methods to organosilicon-based substances was not evaluated during the validation of this guideline. Therefore, the aim of the current work was to assess the applicability of EpiSkin™ and EpiDerm™ SIT in vitro methods for organosilicons. Ten substances were evaluated, and results were compared with existing rabbit data. The data showed that both test methods failed to accurately predict the in vivo skin irritation potential, with predictive capacities below the minimum test guideline requirements. The two models delivered consistent results in only 60% of the cases. Several hypotheses were explored to explain this high rate of discordance without success. As EpiDerm™ SIT showed 100% sensitivity, a new stepwise testing strategy is proposed for organosilicons consisting of starting with EpiDerm™ SIT, following by EpiSkin™ in case of positive outcome. While keeping protective, this adapted strategy avoids unnecessary animal testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105778
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applicability of the in vitro skin irritation methods (EpiSkin™, EpiDerm™ SIT) to organosilicon-based substances

Farah Koraïchi-Emeriau, Dorothea Eigler, Werner Koch, Shawn D. Seidel et al.
6 citations
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Animal testing and alternatives
14.13
article

Applicability of the in vitro skin irritation methods (EpiSkin™, EpiDerm™ SIT) to organosilicon-based substances

Farah Koraïchi-Emeriau, Dorothea Eigler, Werner Koch, Shawn D. Seidel, B Schmitt, Carole Forlini, Eckart Gura, Michael Haack
article en
6 citations

Abstract

It is now widely accepted that the reconstructed human epidermis models (OECD TG 439) can be used as a standalone replacement of the in vivo rabbit assay (OECD TG 404) to accurately predict skin irritancy. Many legislations have now introduced the legal requirement to use in vitro methods as the first step. The applicability of these methods to organosilicon-based substances was not evaluated during the validation of this guideline. Therefore, the aim of the current work was to assess the applicability of EpiSkin™ and EpiDerm™ SIT in vitro methods for organosilicons. Ten substances were evaluated, and results were compared with existing rabbit data. The data showed that both test methods failed to accurately predict the in vivo skin irritation potential, with predictive capacities below the minimum test guideline requirements. The two models delivered consistent results in only 60% of the cases. Several hypotheses were explored to explain this high rate of discordance without success. As EpiDerm™ SIT showed 100% sensitivity, a new stepwise testing strategy is proposed for organosilicons consisting of starting with EpiDerm™ SIT, following by EpiSkin™ in case of positive outcome. While keeping protective, this adapted strategy avoids unnecessary animal testing.

Regulatory Toxicology and PharmacologyVol. 157
Evonik (Germany) (DE), Bluestar Silicones (France) (FR), Wacker Group (Germany) (DE), Michigan United (US), Dow Chemical (United States) (US), Applied Research Associates (NZ)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Animal testing and alternatives
14.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.