Using Multiple-Hop Assessments and Reactive Strength Indices to Differentiate Sprinting Performance in Sportsmen

Multiple-hop tests are commonly used in both performance and rehabilitation settings to assess neuromuscular function. This study aimed to explore the relationship between hop performance and sprint ability. Specifically, it focused on three goals: (1) examining the connection between 3-Hop and 5-Hop distances and sprint performance and comparing the strength of relationship between hop kinetics and sprint times; (2) investigating two methods of calculating the 3-Hop and 5-Hop Reactive Strength Indexes (RSIhors) and their relationship to sprinting; and (3) assessing whether hop ratios or kinetic variables could distinguish sprinters of varying abilities. Forty-four male sportsmen participated, completing 3-Hop and 5-Hop tests and sprint times (5–45 m) over 54 inground force platforms. Ground reaction forces (GRFs) were collected during hop trials and horizontal and vertical hop propulsive and braking kinetics were determined. Results showed strong negative correlations between hop distances and sprint times (r = −0.700 to −0.796), while kinetic variables showed weaker relationships with sprint performance (r = −0.554 to 0.017). RSIhor, derived from hop distance, correlated more strongly with sprint performance than RSIhor from flight time. Hop ratios (5-Hop/3-Hop) did not differentiate fast from slow sprinters, and maximal vertical force and horizontal propulsive impulse were the best predictors of 10 m and 40 m sprint times. These findings suggest that hop distance and RSIhor are valuable tools for assessing sprint performance and reactive strength.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041685
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Multiple-Hop Assessments and Reactive Strength Indices to Differentiate Sprinting Performance in Sportsmen

Anthony P. Sharp, John Barry Cronin, Jonathon Neville, Tomohito Wada et al.
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
article

Using Multiple-Hop Assessments and Reactive Strength Indices to Differentiate Sprinting Performance in Sportsmen

Anthony P. Sharp, John Barry Cronin, Jonathon Neville, Tomohito Wada, Ryu Nagahara
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Multiple-hop tests are commonly used in both performance and rehabilitation settings to assess neuromuscular function. This study aimed to explore the relationship between hop performance and sprint ability. Specifically, it focused on three goals: (1) examining the connection between 3-Hop and 5-Hop distances and sprint performance and comparing the strength of relationship between hop kinetics and sprint times; (2) investigating two methods of calculating the 3-Hop and 5-Hop Reactive Strength Indexes (RSIhors) and their relationship to sprinting; and (3) assessing whether hop ratios or kinetic variables could distinguish sprinters of varying abilities. Forty-four male sportsmen participated, completing 3-Hop and 5-Hop tests and sprint times (5–45 m) over 54 inground force platforms. Ground reaction forces (GRFs) were collected during hop trials and horizontal and vertical hop propulsive and braking kinetics were determined. Results showed strong negative correlations between hop distances and sprint times (r = −0.700 to −0.796), while kinetic variables showed weaker relationships with sprint performance (r = −0.554 to 0.017). RSIhor, derived from hop distance, correlated more strongly with sprint performance than RSIhor from flight time. Hop ratios (5-Hop/3-Hop) did not differentiate fast from slow sprinters, and maximal vertical force and horizontal propulsive impulse were the best predictors of 10 m and 40 m sprint times. These findings suggest that hop distance and RSIhor are valuable tools for assessing sprint performance and reactive strength.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(4)
National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya (JP), Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.