An integrated model of ambivalence and deterrence of bystander inaction in delegitimizing doxing

Our study seeks to explain bystander inaction by guiding the regulation of delegitimizing doxing. We develop a contextualized research model by integrating attitudinal ambivalence theory and general deterrence theory. Our results innovatively uncover three congruence effects describing how positive and negative appraisals are combined to determine bystander inaction. Moreover, perceived SNS deterrence weakens the negative impact of attitudinal univalence on bystander inaction. As one of the pioneering empirical inquiries into delegitimizing doxing, our study contributes to theory and practice related to bystander intervention in delegitimizing doxing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information & Management
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2025.104118
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An integrated model of ambivalence and deterrence of bystander inaction in delegitimizing doxing

Yangjun Li, Zehao He, Xiao‐Liang Shen, Matthew Lee et al.
2 citations
Information & Management
Crime Patterns and Interventions
8.40
article

An integrated model of ambivalence and deterrence of bystander inaction in delegitimizing doxing

Yangjun Li, Zehao He, Xiao‐Liang Shen, Matthew Lee, Christy M.K. Cheung
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Our study seeks to explain bystander inaction by guiding the regulation of delegitimizing doxing. We develop a contextualized research model by integrating attitudinal ambivalence theory and general deterrence theory. Our results innovatively uncover three congruence effects describing how positive and negative appraisals are combined to determine bystander inaction. Moreover, perceived SNS deterrence weakens the negative impact of attitudinal univalence on bystander inaction. As one of the pioneering empirical inquiries into delegitimizing doxing, our study contributes to theory and practice related to bystander intervention in delegitimizing doxing.

Information & ManagementVol. 62(3)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Wuhan University (CN), Wuhan Business University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An integrated model of ambivalence and deterrence of bystander inaction in delegitimizing doxing — Yangjun Li, Zehao He, et al. · Information & Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS