Technological and functional analyses of late Mesolithic and early Neolithic lithic assemblages from Riparo Gaban (Trento, Italy)

• Riparo Gaban has long been recognised as both a Mesolithic and Neolithic settlement. • It stands as one of the few Mediterranean sites where the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition can be thoroughly evaluated. • Exploring the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition through shifts in technical traditions. • Evaluating tools and activities uniquely characteristic of the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods. • Subsistence activities are investigated through use-wear analysis of stone tools. The transition between the last Mesolithic hunter-gatherers and the first agropastoral Neolithic communities is a highly debated topic in prehistoric archaeology. Riparo Gaban (Northeast Italy) is a key site to unravel this fundamental turning point in human history because it is one of the few archaeological contexts in Mediterranean Europe where occupations from both periods are stratigraphically recorded. This study focuses on understanding the Meso-Neo transition process through lithic tool analysis. It addresses the raw material and the technology applied to lithic tool production and the subsistence and craft activities to which the tools were allocated, through functional analysis. The results demonstrate that, apart from certain distinctly Neolithic tools such as the Ripabianca burins, the use of specific knapping techniques like pressure flaking, and the increased presence of certain types of flint, the toolkit from Riparo Gaban shows no significant differences between the Late Mesolithic levels and the early Neolithic levels. Similarly, the activities identified through functional analysis also show little variation. These findings suggest that the model of new Neolithic settlements did not always bring substantial changes in economic structures, technical traditions, or craft activities compared to those of the last hunter-gatherer groups. The scenarios during this transitional period must have been highly diverse across Europe and the Mediterranean Basin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105031
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technological and functional analyses of late Mesolithic and early Neolithic lithic assemblages from Riparo Gaban (Trento, Italy)

Niccolò Mazzucco, Juan Francisco Gibaja, Stefano Grimaldi, Annaluisa Pedrotti et al.
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Technological and functional analyses of late Mesolithic and early Neolithic lithic assemblages from Riparo Gaban (Trento, Italy)

Niccolò Mazzucco, Juan Francisco Gibaja, Stefano Grimaldi, Annaluisa Pedrotti, Fabio Santaniello, Maurizio Zambaldi
article en

Abstract

• Riparo Gaban has long been recognised as both a Mesolithic and Neolithic settlement. • It stands as one of the few Mediterranean sites where the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition can be thoroughly evaluated. • Exploring the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition through shifts in technical traditions. • Evaluating tools and activities uniquely characteristic of the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods. • Subsistence activities are investigated through use-wear analysis of stone tools. The transition between the last Mesolithic hunter-gatherers and the first agropastoral Neolithic communities is a highly debated topic in prehistoric archaeology. Riparo Gaban (Northeast Italy) is a key site to unravel this fundamental turning point in human history because it is one of the few archaeological contexts in Mediterranean Europe where occupations from both periods are stratigraphically recorded. This study focuses on understanding the Meso-Neo transition process through lithic tool analysis. It addresses the raw material and the technology applied to lithic tool production and the subsistence and craft activities to which the tools were allocated, through functional analysis. The results demonstrate that, apart from certain distinctly Neolithic tools such as the Ripabianca burins, the use of specific knapping techniques like pressure flaking, and the increased presence of certain types of flint, the toolkit from Riparo Gaban shows no significant differences between the Late Mesolithic levels and the early Neolithic levels. Similarly, the activities identified through functional analysis also show little variation. These findings suggest that the model of new Neolithic settlements did not always bring substantial changes in economic structures, technical traditions, or craft activities compared to those of the last hunter-gatherer groups. The scenarios during this transitional period must have been highly diverse across Europe and the Mediterranean Basin.

Journal of Archaeological Science ReportsVol. 62
University of Pisa (IT), University of Trento (IT), Institución Milá y Fontanals de Investigación en Humanidades (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.