The benefits of inclusive conservation for connectivity of lions across the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania

Abstract Human impacts on the planet degrade natural habitats, often restricting wildlife to protected areas. If connectivity between such areas is lost, wildlife populations may lose genetic diversity, thereby increasing extinction risk. For large carnivores, connecting populations separated by human‐occupied habitats requires dedicated effort to foster human–wildlife coexistence. Using lion observation data from 1962 to 2023 and movement data from GPS collars, we evaluated how inclusive conservation actions (i.e., directly involving local communities) in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA), Tanzania, are affecting the ability of lions to use and traverse human‐occupied habitats. Efforts to promote human–lion coexistence were positively associated with the number of lions moving across human‐occupied habitats and the ability of lions to settle in human‐occupied areas, suggesting that conservation activities are having the desired impact on connectivity. However, despite a reduction in negative human–lion interactions from 2016 to 2021, the number of retaliatory lion killings and livestock attacks both increased sharply during an extreme drought in 2022, before dropping again in 2023. Thus, although our results highlight the benefits of inclusive conservation for connectivity of large carnivore populations, recent events highlight continued challenges and the need for long‐term, nimble approaches to maintain balance where humans and large carnivores coexist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70001
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The benefits of inclusive conservation for connectivity of lions across the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania

Camilla Sandström, Bernard M. Kissui, Arielle W. Parsons, Craig Packer et al.
4 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
6.87
article

The benefits of inclusive conservation for connectivity of lions across the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania

Camilla Sandström, Bernard M. Kissui, Arielle W. Parsons, Craig Packer, Ingela Jansson, Sally Capper, Lisa J. Faust
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Human impacts on the planet degrade natural habitats, often restricting wildlife to protected areas. If connectivity between such areas is lost, wildlife populations may lose genetic diversity, thereby increasing extinction risk. For large carnivores, connecting populations separated by human‐occupied habitats requires dedicated effort to foster human–wildlife coexistence. Using lion observation data from 1962 to 2023 and movement data from GPS collars, we evaluated how inclusive conservation actions (i.e., directly involving local communities) in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA), Tanzania, are affecting the ability of lions to use and traverse human‐occupied habitats. Efforts to promote human–lion coexistence were positively associated with the number of lions moving across human‐occupied habitats and the ability of lions to settle in human‐occupied areas, suggesting that conservation activities are having the desired impact on connectivity. However, despite a reduction in negative human–lion interactions from 2016 to 2021, the number of retaliatory lion killings and livestock attacks both increased sharply during an extreme drought in 2022, before dropping again in 2023. Thus, although our results highlight the benefits of inclusive conservation for connectivity of large carnivore populations, recent events highlight continued challenges and the need for long‐term, nimble approaches to maintain balance where humans and large carnivores coexist.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(3)
University of Minnesota (US), Lincoln Park Zoo (US), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Tanzania National Parks (TZ), School for Field Studies (US), Umeå University (SE)
World Wildlife Fund, Panthera, National Geographic Society, Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.