Carer harm: a challenge for practitioners, services and research

Purpose The purpose of this study is to consider how carer harm is understood, surfaced and responded to in contemporary policy, practice and research. Design/methodology/approach This paper offers a reflective commentary on the current “state of play” relating to carer harm drawing on existing research and related literature. This study focuses on how we define carer harm and what we know about its impact; lessons from, and for, practice and service provision; and (some) considerations for policy development and future research. Findings The authors highlight the importance of engaging with the gendered dimensions (and inequalities) that lie at the intersection of experience of care and violence and the need to move beyond binary conceptions of power (lessness) in family and intimate relationships over the life course. They suggest that changing how we think and talk about carer harm may support practitioners to better recognise the impact of direct and indirect forms of carer harm on carers without stigmatising or blaming people with care needs. The findings of this study also consider how carer harm is “hidden in plain sight” on two accounts. The issue falls through the gaps between, broadly, domestic abuse and adult and child safeguarding services; similarly, the nature and impact of harm is often kept private by carers who are fearful of the moral and practical consequences of sharing their experiences. Originality/value This study sets out recommendations to this effect and invites an ongoing conversation about how change for carers and families can be realised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Adult Protection
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jap-09-2024-0053
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carer harm: a challenge for practitioners, services and research

Alisoun Milne, Lorna Montgomery, Sarah Wydall, Fiona Sherwood‐Johnson et al.
The Journal of Adult Protection
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

Carer harm: a challenge for practitioners, services and research

Alisoun Milne, Lorna Montgomery, Sarah Wydall, Fiona Sherwood‐Johnson, Louise Isham, Sarah Donnelly, Kathryn Mackay
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to consider how carer harm is understood, surfaced and responded to in contemporary policy, practice and research. Design/methodology/approach This paper offers a reflective commentary on the current “state of play” relating to carer harm drawing on existing research and related literature. This study focuses on how we define carer harm and what we know about its impact; lessons from, and for, practice and service provision; and (some) considerations for policy development and future research. Findings The authors highlight the importance of engaging with the gendered dimensions (and inequalities) that lie at the intersection of experience of care and violence and the need to move beyond binary conceptions of power (lessness) in family and intimate relationships over the life course. They suggest that changing how we think and talk about carer harm may support practitioners to better recognise the impact of direct and indirect forms of carer harm on carers without stigmatising or blaming people with care needs. The findings of this study also consider how carer harm is “hidden in plain sight” on two accounts. The issue falls through the gaps between, broadly, domestic abuse and adult and child safeguarding services; similarly, the nature and impact of harm is often kept private by carers who are fearful of the moral and practical consequences of sharing their experiences. Originality/value This study sets out recommendations to this effect and invites an ongoing conversation about how change for carers and families can be realised.

The Journal of Adult ProtectionVol. 27(3)
University College Dublin (IE), University of Stirling (GB), Queen's University Belfast (GB), Swansea University (GB), Social Justice Ireland (IE), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.