Leveraging on large language model to classify sentences: a case study applying STAGES scoring methodology for sentence completion test on ego development

While this suggests valuable scoring that leverages large language models, it also highlights the opportunity for further refinement to closely match expert assessments. We observed low variability in aggregated values, demonstrating that the automated process functions effectively at scale. The robustness of aggregated data is particularly evident when calculating ego development scores for individuals, groups, corporate units, and entire corporations. This capability underscores the utility of the automated system for high-level evaluations and decision-making leveraging on a solid indicator. While the classification system developed in this case study shows promise, targeted enhancements may help to achieve a level of accuracy and reliability that improves alignment with experts' evaluations for single sentences. The methodology developed in this case study appears to be useful to support other evaluations at scale that leverage large language models using other maps of classifications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1488102
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging on large language model to classify sentences: a case study applying STAGES scoring methodology for sentence completion test on ego development

Xavier Bronlet
1 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Educational and Psychological Assessments
3.44
article

Leveraging on large language model to classify sentences: a case study applying STAGES scoring methodology for sentence completion test on ego development

Xavier Bronlet
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While this suggests valuable scoring that leverages large language models, it also highlights the opportunity for further refinement to closely match expert assessments. We observed low variability in aggregated values, demonstrating that the automated process functions effectively at scale. The robustness of aggregated data is particularly evident when calculating ego development scores for individuals, groups, corporate units, and entire corporations. This capability underscores the utility of the automated system for high-level evaluations and decision-making leveraging on a solid indicator. While the classification system developed in this case study shows promise, targeted enhancements may help to achieve a level of accuracy and reliability that improves alignment with experts' evaluations for single sentences. The methodology developed in this case study appears to be useful to support other evaluations at scale that leverage large language models using other maps of classifications.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.