Real world data on digital remote refraction in a healthy population of 14,680 eyes

Refractive errors are the leading cause of preventable visual impairment, to which web-based remote refraction could contribute. We report real-world 2021-2022 data of the underlying algorithm and validated these to conventional prescriptions among healthy individuals (high visual acuity and satisfactied current refraction). Participants were 18-45 years with a spherical (S) error between -3.50 + 2.00S to -2.00 Diopter Cylinder (DC), reported as Spherical Equivalent (SEQ) in mean differences and 95% Limits of agreement. Consecutive measurements (n = 14,680) were assessed of which n = 6386 selected for validation. The mean difference was 0.01D(SD 0.69) and -0.73D(SD 0.92) for myopes and hyperopes respectively. This algorithm shows variation, nonetheless, 67% and 82% of myopes were within ±0.5 and ±0.75D. The test underestimates hyperopes (34% and 50% within ±0.5D and ±0.75D) and had inconsistencies distinguishing hyperopia. This proof-of-concept shows home testing has the potency to increase accessibility to care by delivering a valuable alternative for uncomplicated refractive assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01453-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real world data on digital remote refraction in a healthy population of 14,680 eyes

Robert P. L. Wisse, Gerko Vink, Laurence E. Frank, Casper van der Zee et al.
2 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
2.71
article

Real world data on digital remote refraction in a healthy population of 14,680 eyes

Robert P. L. Wisse, Gerko Vink, Laurence E. Frank, Casper van der Zee, Marc B. Muijzer, H. Jamal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Refractive errors are the leading cause of preventable visual impairment, to which web-based remote refraction could contribute. We report real-world 2021-2022 data of the underlying algorithm and validated these to conventional prescriptions among healthy individuals (high visual acuity and satisfactied current refraction). Participants were 18-45 years with a spherical (S) error between -3.50 + 2.00S to -2.00 Diopter Cylinder (DC), reported as Spherical Equivalent (SEQ) in mean differences and 95% Limits of agreement. Consecutive measurements (n = 14,680) were assessed of which n = 6386 selected for validation. The mean difference was 0.01D(SD 0.69) and -0.73D(SD 0.92) for myopes and hyperopes respectively. This algorithm shows variation, nonetheless, 67% and 82% of myopes were within ±0.5 and ±0.75D. The test underestimates hyperopes (34% and 50% within ±0.5D and ±0.75D) and had inconsistencies distinguishing hyperopia. This proof-of-concept shows home testing has the potency to increase accessibility to care by delivering a valuable alternative for uncomplicated refractive assessments.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Real world data on digital remote refraction in a healthy population of 14,680 eyes — Robert P. L. Wisse, Gerko Vink, et al. · npj Digital Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS