Comparing Minor Connector Castability of Printed Cast Partial Dentures to Conventional Cast Partial Dentures: An In-vitro Study

Introduction: Partial denture prostheses are used to restore missing teeth and oral function, with minor connectors playing a crucial role in the denture framework. Traditionally, Cast Partial Dentures (CPD) are made using wax patterns and metal casting; however, this process can sometimes result in issues such as porosity or distortion. Advances in digital dentistry have introduced 3D printing, which offers a new method for creating denture frameworks with greater precision. However, the impact of 3D printing on the castability of minor connectors compared to conventional methods remains underexplored. Aim: To compare the minor connector castability of manually CPDs to Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) printed partial dentures. Key objectives include assessing the minor connector castability between the two groups, manual and DMLS, before and after wax-up and casting. Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics at Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from July 2023 to December 2023. A total of 10 samples were included and divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of five samples of manually CPDs, while group 2 included five samples of DMLS printed partial dentures. A standardised casting procedure was followed for both the manually cast and DMLS printed partial dentures to evaluate their minor connector castability. The two groups were compared for wax-up and casting. To assess castability, the number of lattice framework holes in each connector was counted after waxup and fabrication. Statistical analysis was performed using a statistical software program Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non parametric test, was used, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results: Comparisons between the groups revealed a statistically significant difference in the medians of manual waxup (p=0.25) and casting compared to DMLS (p=0.317) design and printing. The DMLS group demonstrated superior accuracy compared to manual casting. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that the Removable Partial Denture (RPD) frameworks designed and produced by DMLS exhibit better castability compared to manual wax-up and casting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2025/75991.20590
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Minor Connector Castability of Printed Cast Partial Dentures to Conventional Cast Partial Dentures: An In-vitro Study

Suresh Venugopalan, Meghna Budati
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparing Minor Connector Castability of Printed Cast Partial Dentures to Conventional Cast Partial Dentures: An In-vitro Study

Suresh Venugopalan, Meghna Budati
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Partial denture prostheses are used to restore missing teeth and oral function, with minor connectors playing a crucial role in the denture framework. Traditionally, Cast Partial Dentures (CPD) are made using wax patterns and metal casting; however, this process can sometimes result in issues such as porosity or distortion. Advances in digital dentistry have introduced 3D printing, which offers a new method for creating denture frameworks with greater precision. However, the impact of 3D printing on the castability of minor connectors compared to conventional methods remains underexplored. Aim: To compare the minor connector castability of manually CPDs to Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) printed partial dentures. Key objectives include assessing the minor connector castability between the two groups, manual and DMLS, before and after wax-up and casting. Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics at Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from July 2023 to December 2023. A total of 10 samples were included and divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of five samples of manually CPDs, while group 2 included five samples of DMLS printed partial dentures. A standardised casting procedure was followed for both the manually cast and DMLS printed partial dentures to evaluate their minor connector castability. The two groups were compared for wax-up and casting. To assess castability, the number of lattice framework holes in each connector was counted after waxup and fabrication. Statistical analysis was performed using a statistical software program Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non parametric test, was used, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results: Comparisons between the groups revealed a statistically significant difference in the medians of manual waxup (p=0.25) and casting compared to DMLS (p=0.317) design and printing. The DMLS group demonstrated superior accuracy compared to manual casting. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that the Removable Partial Denture (RPD) frameworks designed and produced by DMLS exhibit better castability compared to manual wax-up and casting.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.