Distinguishing between destructive and constructive resistance in strategy implementation processes

The commonly expected response to new strategy implementation, or organizational change more broadly, is resistance. This resistance is often considered a hindrance to strategy implementation efforts, and as such, leaders are encouraged to overcome resistance in order to achieve organizational goals. In this paper we challenge the notion that all resistance is a hindrance. Instead, we encourage organizational leaders charged with strategy implementation to distinguish between destructive resistance and constructive resistance and engage with constructive resistance, an approach that should enhance the process of change. Drawing on examples from several different industries, we detail ways to distinguish between constructive and destructive resistance. We offer practical suggestions for managers and leaders to embrace constructive resistance to enhance strategy implementation processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Dynamics
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101127
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing between destructive and constructive resistance in strategy implementation processes

Kimberly Rocheville, Jean M. Bartunek
1 citations
Organizational Dynamics
Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
2.23
article

Distinguishing between destructive and constructive resistance in strategy implementation processes

Kimberly Rocheville, Jean M. Bartunek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The commonly expected response to new strategy implementation, or organizational change more broadly, is resistance. This resistance is often considered a hindrance to strategy implementation efforts, and as such, leaders are encouraged to overcome resistance in order to achieve organizational goals. In this paper we challenge the notion that all resistance is a hindrance. Instead, we encourage organizational leaders charged with strategy implementation to distinguish between destructive resistance and constructive resistance and engage with constructive resistance, an approach that should enhance the process of change. Drawing on examples from several different industries, we detail ways to distinguish between constructive and destructive resistance. We offer practical suggestions for managers and leaders to embrace constructive resistance to enhance strategy implementation processes.

Organizational DynamicsVol. 54(4)
Boston College (US), Creighton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Distinguishing between destructive and constructive resistance in strategy implementation processes — Kimberly Rocheville, Jean M. Bartunek · Organizational Dynamics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS