<i>Budget Conditionality</i> judgments: A virtuous circle of solidarity to overcome moral hazard?

The twin judgments in Budget Conditionality link the EU budget with solidarity, mutual trust and the effective implementation of EU law, marking a significant evolution in EU principles. These judgments elevate solidarity to a foundational stage in the EU's development. This article argues that solidarity is now being interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) as a practical tool to counter moral hazard and integrate solidarity into the EU legal cornerstones. The CJEU is operationalizing technically solidarity from a vague concept to one with concrete implications for EU public finances, linking it directly with the budget, rule of law and mutual trust among Member States. By doing so, the CJEU is making solidarity a central element of the EU legal order, transforming the discourse from financial allocations to a broader focus on shared responsibilities and compliance with EU law, thus reinforcing the EU’s foundational values of peace, democracy and the rule of law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x251314450
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Budget Conditionality judgments: A virtuous circle of solidarity to overcome moral hazard?

Yseult Marique
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

Budget Conditionality judgments: A virtuous circle of solidarity to overcome moral hazard?

Yseult Marique
article en

Abstract

The twin judgments in Budget Conditionality link the EU budget with solidarity, mutual trust and the effective implementation of EU law, marking a significant evolution in EU principles. These judgments elevate solidarity to a foundational stage in the EU's development. This article argues that solidarity is now being interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) as a practical tool to counter moral hazard and integrate solidarity into the EU legal cornerstones. The CJEU is operationalizing technically solidarity from a vague concept to one with concrete implications for EU public finances, linking it directly with the budget, rule of law and mutual trust among Member States. By doing so, the CJEU is making solidarity a central element of the EU legal order, transforming the discourse from financial allocations to a broader focus on shared responsibilities and compliance with EU law, thus reinforcing the EU’s foundational values of peace, democracy and the rule of law.

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative LawVol. 31(6)
University of Essex (GB), UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<i>Budget Conditionality</i> judgments: A virtuous circle of solidarity to overcome moral hazard? — Yseult Marique · Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS