Patient and Public Involvement Model in Healthcare AI Ethics: Based on Scoping Review and Methodological Reflections

To apply healthcare AI ethics in clinical and research settings, self-regulatory frameworks emphasize the necessity of external validation. Building on theoretical discussions that justify patients and the public as key actors in this validation process, this article conducts a scoping review on patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare AI and proposes a model for their engagement. A search was conducted in academic databases using the keywords “AI” and “patient and public involvement.” Out of the 114 studies that were identified, 16 were selected for review; the selected studies consisted of four scoping reviews, eight empirical studies, and four theoretical papers. The review confirmed ongoing discussions on PPI in healthcare AI, but highlighted the lack of detailed implementation strategies. This article suggests participatory design, healthcare AI literacy, and citizen science models as potential approaches for engagement, discussing their possibilities and limitations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2024.27.4.177
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient and Public Involvement Model in Healthcare AI Ethics: Based on Scoping Review and Methodological Reflections

Junhewk Kim
1 citations
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
0.85
article

Patient and Public Involvement Model in Healthcare AI Ethics: Based on Scoping Review and Methodological Reflections

Junhewk Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To apply healthcare AI ethics in clinical and research settings, self-regulatory frameworks emphasize the necessity of external validation. Building on theoretical discussions that justify patients and the public as key actors in this validation process, this article conducts a scoping review on patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare AI and proposes a model for their engagement. A search was conducted in academic databases using the keywords “AI” and “patient and public involvement.” Out of the 114 studies that were identified, 16 were selected for review; the selected studies consisted of four scoping reviews, eight empirical studies, and four theoretical papers. The review confirmed ongoing discussions on PPI in healthcare AI, but highlighted the lack of detailed implementation strategies. This article suggests participatory design, healthcare AI literacy, and citizen science models as potential approaches for engagement, discussing their possibilities and limitations.

Korean Journal of Medical EthicsVol. 27(4)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patient and Public Involvement Model in Healthcare AI Ethics: Based on Scoping Review and Methodological Reflections — Junhewk Kim · Korean Journal of Medical Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS