Towards an Ontological Shift in Patient and Citizen Participation

Amid the growing prominence of healthcare artificial intelligence (AI), current research still pays only nominal attention to patient and citizen participation. However, this engagement rarely extends beyond tokenism, as healthcare AI ethics continues to reinforce rigid distinctions between doctors and patients and also between subjects and objects. These distinctions, which impedes genuine participation, are rooted in a specific ontology. By embracing a new ontology, participation becomes self-evident, shifting the focus from questioning its feasibility to justifying any limitations on its scope. Importantly, this shift is not limited to healthcare AI ethics; adopting a new ontology could enable meaningful progress across the entire field of bioethics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2024.27.4.203
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an Ontological Shift in Patient and Citizen Participation

Tegu JOE
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Towards an Ontological Shift in Patient and Citizen Participation

Tegu JOE
article en

Abstract

Amid the growing prominence of healthcare artificial intelligence (AI), current research still pays only nominal attention to patient and citizen participation. However, this engagement rarely extends beyond tokenism, as healthcare AI ethics continues to reinforce rigid distinctions between doctors and patients and also between subjects and objects. These distinctions, which impedes genuine participation, are rooted in a specific ontology. By embracing a new ontology, participation becomes self-evident, shifting the focus from questioning its feasibility to justifying any limitations on its scope. Importantly, this shift is not limited to healthcare AI ethics; adopting a new ontology could enable meaningful progress across the entire field of bioethics.

Korean Journal of Medical EthicsVol. 27(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.