A comparison of three modes of online key word sign training to determine efficacy and acceptability in comparison to in-person key word sign training

Key Word Sign (KWS) is an unaided form of augmentative and alternative communication where manual signing is used for people with complex communication needs. Communication partners require training; however geographical, familial and personal barriers impact accessing KWS training. Online training has become more common; however, no research has investigated the online delivery of KWS training. This mixed methods study compared efficacy and acceptability of online training programs delivered synchronously, asynchronously or as a combination of both (hybrid), with results from a previous study that measured face-to-face training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2024.2439842
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of three modes of online key word sign training to determine efficacy and acceptability in comparison to in-person key word sign training

Leigha Dark, Jeremy H. M. Wong, Natalie Munro, Andy Smidt et al.
1 citations
Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
5.77
article

A comparison of three modes of online key word sign training to determine efficacy and acceptability in comparison to in-person key word sign training

Leigha Dark, Jeremy H. M. Wong, Natalie Munro, Andy Smidt, I-Hsin Chou, Elizabeth Brownlie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Key Word Sign (KWS) is an unaided form of augmentative and alternative communication where manual signing is used for people with complex communication needs. Communication partners require training; however geographical, familial and personal barriers impact accessing KWS training. Online training has become more common; however, no research has investigated the online delivery of KWS training. This mixed methods study compared efficacy and acceptability of online training programs delivered synchronously, asynchronously or as a combination of both (hybrid), with results from a previous study that measured face-to-face training.

Augmentative and Alternative Communication
The University of Sydney (AU), Southern Cross University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison of three modes of online key word sign training to determine efficacy and acceptability in comparison to in-person key word sign training — Leigha Dark, Jeremy H. M. Wong, et al. · Augmentative and Alternative Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS