A Pilot Study: Evaluating Disposable Syringes Compared to Non‐Disposable Syringes for Dental Training
While safety continues to be a concern, students and faculty prefer non-disposable metal syringes over disposable syringes. Most dissatisfaction with using the disposable syringe came from the aspiration system. But prior experience and comfort using non-disposable metal syringes, a lack of experience and confidence with local anesthesia procedures and a lack of experience with disposable syringes, may have contributed to these outcomes. Despite usability issues with the disposable syringe, performance was more impacted by lack of experience than the type of syringe used. Introducing both syringes early into the curriculum may help overcome usability factors, further reduce needlestick exposures, and prepare students for different workplace environments. Providing adequate training for faculty, especially on the differences between the two syringes, such as aspiration, will help alleviate discomfort and better promote the use of both.
Authors
- Elizabeth McAlpin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3450-2012)
- C Watson
- Marci H. Levine
- Robert Glickman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-4582)
- Gene Sherwin
- Tara Byrd
- Aaron Soeprono
- Chrystalla Orthodoxou
- Yvelande Couamin
Institutions
- New York University (US)
- New York College of Health Professions (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Dental Education
- Published
- 2025-02-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13847
- Primary Topic
- Dental Research and COVID-19
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00