A Pilot Study: Evaluating Disposable Syringes Compared to Non‐Disposable Syringes for Dental Training

While safety continues to be a concern, students and faculty prefer non-disposable metal syringes over disposable syringes. Most dissatisfaction with using the disposable syringe came from the aspiration system. But prior experience and comfort using non-disposable metal syringes, a lack of experience and confidence with local anesthesia procedures and a lack of experience with disposable syringes, may have contributed to these outcomes. Despite usability issues with the disposable syringe, performance was more impacted by lack of experience than the type of syringe used. Introducing both syringes early into the curriculum may help overcome usability factors, further reduce needlestick exposures, and prepare students for different workplace environments. Providing adequate training for faculty, especially on the differences between the two syringes, such as aspiration, will help alleviate discomfort and better promote the use of both.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dental Education
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13847
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Pilot Study: Evaluating Disposable Syringes Compared to Non‐Disposable Syringes for Dental Training

Elizabeth McAlpin, C Watson, Marci H. Levine, Robert Glickman et al.
Journal of Dental Education
Dental Research and COVID-19
article

A Pilot Study: Evaluating Disposable Syringes Compared to Non‐Disposable Syringes for Dental Training

Elizabeth McAlpin, C Watson, Marci H. Levine, Robert Glickman, Gene Sherwin, Tara Byrd, Aaron Soeprono, Chrystalla Orthodoxou, Yvelande Couamin
article en

Abstract

While safety continues to be a concern, students and faculty prefer non-disposable metal syringes over disposable syringes. Most dissatisfaction with using the disposable syringe came from the aspiration system. But prior experience and comfort using non-disposable metal syringes, a lack of experience and confidence with local anesthesia procedures and a lack of experience with disposable syringes, may have contributed to these outcomes. Despite usability issues with the disposable syringe, performance was more impacted by lack of experience than the type of syringe used. Introducing both syringes early into the curriculum may help overcome usability factors, further reduce needlestick exposures, and prepare students for different workplace environments. Providing adequate training for faculty, especially on the differences between the two syringes, such as aspiration, will help alleviate discomfort and better promote the use of both.

Journal of Dental EducationVol. 89(9)
New York University (US), New York College of Health Professions (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Dental Research and COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.