A Norwegian adaptation of the quality in psychiatric care – inpatient staff (QPC-IPS): psychometric evaluation and staff assessment of quality of care

The Norwegian QPC-IPS demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, facilitating its use in assessing psychiatric care staff's perception of patients' experiences of quality of care. Insights from staff perspectives contribute to identifying areas for improvement in inpatient psychiatric care, thereby enhancing cross-cultural comparisons and theory development in this domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2025.2461453
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Norwegian adaptation of the quality in psychiatric care – inpatient staff (QPC-IPS): psychometric evaluation and staff assessment of quality of care

Øyfrid Larsen Moen, Agneta Schröder, Marianne Thorsen Gonzalez, Lars‐Olov Lundqvist et al.
1 citations
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Healthcare Quality and Management
2.94
article

A Norwegian adaptation of the quality in psychiatric care – inpatient staff (QPC-IPS): psychometric evaluation and staff assessment of quality of care

Øyfrid Larsen Moen, Agneta Schröder, Marianne Thorsen Gonzalez, Lars‐Olov Lundqvist, Hege Skundberg‐Kletthagen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Norwegian QPC-IPS demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, facilitating its use in assessing psychiatric care staff's perception of patients' experiences of quality of care. Insights from staff perspectives contribute to identifying areas for improvement in inpatient psychiatric care, thereby enhancing cross-cultural comparisons and theory development in this domain.

Nordic Journal of PsychiatryVol. 79(2)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Örebro University (SE), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Healthcare Quality and Management
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.