Literary Naturalism in North America:

The representation of nonhuman animals in literature has always beencharacterised by a process of anthropomorphisation. On the one hand,this may be due to the traditional human exceptionalism present inWestern cultures in most historical periods; and, on the other hand, to thedifficulty that humans face in imagining other ways of being beyond oown. Thus, literary creations have traditionally tended to fall into theanthropomorphisation of animals; that is, to represent them with humancharacteristics so that “it is possible to give the illusion that theirexperience is being reproduced” (Simons 2002, 116). However, with theestablishment of the animal rights movement in the nineteenth century,works of fiction constituted a way to try to proliferate this animalist poiof view.As a consequence of the rise of scientific knowledge and testablishment of the city as the centre of society, there was a need for anew literary representation of nonhuman animals that enacted theimportance of nature as well as attempted to grasp nonhuman animals.In this study I will analyse Ernest T. Seton’s Monarch, the Big Bear of Tallacand Jack London’s The Call of the Wild to determine if they actuallyintroduce a nonanthropomorphic perspective. In order to do so, I willexamine these works by focusing on appearance, communication andmental life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Ethics Review
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31009/aer.2025.v5.05
Primary Topic
American and British Literature Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Literary Naturalism in North America:

Irati Jiménez-Pérez
Animal Ethics Review
American and British Literature Analysis
article

Literary Naturalism in North America:

Irati Jiménez-Pérez
article en

Abstract

The representation of nonhuman animals in literature has always beencharacterised by a process of anthropomorphisation. On the one hand,this may be due to the traditional human exceptionalism present inWestern cultures in most historical periods; and, on the other hand, to thedifficulty that humans face in imagining other ways of being beyond oown. Thus, literary creations have traditionally tended to fall into theanthropomorphisation of animals; that is, to represent them with humancharacteristics so that “it is possible to give the illusion that theirexperience is being reproduced” (Simons 2002, 116). However, with theestablishment of the animal rights movement in the nineteenth century,works of fiction constituted a way to try to proliferate this animalist poiof view.As a consequence of the rise of scientific knowledge and testablishment of the city as the centre of society, there was a need for anew literary representation of nonhuman animals that enacted theimportance of nature as well as attempted to grasp nonhuman animals.In this study I will analyse Ernest T. Seton’s Monarch, the Big Bear of Tallacand Jack London’s The Call of the Wild to determine if they actuallyintroduce a nonanthropomorphic perspective. In order to do so, I willexamine these works by focusing on appearance, communication andmental life.

Animal Ethics ReviewVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
American and British Literature Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.