Binding Energy Calculations of Anthracene and Rhodamine 6G H-Type Dimers: A Comparative Study of DFT and SMD Methods

With the ever-growing need to study systems of increased size and complexity, modern density functional theory (DFT) methods often encounter problems arising from the growing computational demands. In this work, we have presented a comprehensive DFT validation of the steered molecular dynamics (SMD) approach in estimating the binding energies of aromatic dimers. By performing DFT calculations on optimized and unoptimized anthracene and rhodamine 6G (R6G) dimers using functionals with progressively enhanced exchange-correlation energy description and comparing the obtained results with SMD-predicted values, it was found that SMD predictions are in good agreement with the results obtained from hybrid DFT calculations. The average binding energies for optimized anthracene dimers were found to be 6.46 kcal/mol using DFT at ωB97X-D4/def2-QZVPP and 7.64 ± 1.61 kcal/mol as predicted by the SMD. For the R6G H-type dimer, the binding energies were 17.48 and 19.02 ± 2.22 kcal/mol, respectively. The study also revealed that due to the lack of explicit terms accounting for electron-electron interactions in MD force fields, the proposed method tends to overbind dimers. It is anticipated that the presented method can be applied to more complex dimers, potentially accelerating the calculations of binding energies. Moreover, this study further validates the accuracy of the CHARMM36 FF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c07867
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binding Energy Calculations of Anthracene and Rhodamine 6G H-Type Dimers: A Comparative Study of DFT and SMD Methods

Karina Kubiak-Ossowska, Yu Chen, Daniel Doveiko
4 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
7.01
article

Binding Energy Calculations of Anthracene and Rhodamine 6G H-Type Dimers: A Comparative Study of DFT and SMD Methods

Karina Kubiak-Ossowska, Yu Chen, Daniel Doveiko
article en
4 citations

Abstract

With the ever-growing need to study systems of increased size and complexity, modern density functional theory (DFT) methods often encounter problems arising from the growing computational demands. In this work, we have presented a comprehensive DFT validation of the steered molecular dynamics (SMD) approach in estimating the binding energies of aromatic dimers. By performing DFT calculations on optimized and unoptimized anthracene and rhodamine 6G (R6G) dimers using functionals with progressively enhanced exchange-correlation energy description and comparing the obtained results with SMD-predicted values, it was found that SMD predictions are in good agreement with the results obtained from hybrid DFT calculations. The average binding energies for optimized anthracene dimers were found to be 6.46 kcal/mol using DFT at ωB97X-D4/def2-QZVPP and 7.64 ± 1.61 kcal/mol as predicted by the SMD. For the R6G H-type dimer, the binding energies were 17.48 and 19.02 ± 2.22 kcal/mol, respectively. The study also revealed that due to the lack of explicit terms accounting for electron-electron interactions in MD force fields, the proposed method tends to overbind dimers. It is anticipated that the presented method can be applied to more complex dimers, potentially accelerating the calculations of binding energies. Moreover, this study further validates the accuracy of the CHARMM36 FF.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry AVol. 129(12)
University of Strathclyde (GB), Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (GB)
University of Strathclyde, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
7.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.