Evaluation of the Efficiency of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Female Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study

Objective: In this study, it is aimed to determine the efficacy of Low-level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CPPS), and to evaluate the effects of LLLT on depression, anxiety and quality of life. Material and Method: Female CPPS were included in the study. LLLT was applied to the first group, and placebo (sham operation) was applied to the second group. Patients were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MMPQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and 36- Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), before the treatment, at the end of treatment, and 8 weeks after randomization. Results: The patients included in the treatment group (n = 11) and in the placebo group (n = 8) were calculated as 38.91 ± 5.20 and 37.25 ± 6.34, respectively. In the treatment group, a significant difference was found between the pre-treatment (VASPre-T) and end of treatment (VASPost-T) pain values and between pre-treatment (VASPre-T) pain values and pain values measured 8 weeks after randomization (VAS8th-week) (p: 0.003, p: 0.003). Additionally, a significant improvement in MMPQ scores was also found in the treatment group. (p: 0.037 and p: 0.008 respectively). When the MMPQ and BDI values in both groups were compared, there was no difference (p>0.05). Furthermore, it was observed that the level of anxiety (BAI) decreased at the end of the treatment, although not significantly, in the placebo group (p: 0.12), Additionally, significant improvements were observed in terms of SF-36 quality of life scale sub-scores. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that LLLT, a simple, non-invasive, inexpensive and safe treatment method, can be useful in the treatment of CPPS. Yet, large-scale multi-center studies are needed to support the positive results found in favor of LLLT in this study.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Surgery and Clinical Practice
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33425/3066-6538.1007
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Female Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study

Hatice Reşorlu, Alî Keskin, Fatma Beyazıt
Surgery and Clinical Practice
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Female Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study

Hatice Reşorlu, Alî Keskin, Fatma Beyazıt
article en

Abstract

Objective: In this study, it is aimed to determine the efficacy of Low-level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CPPS), and to evaluate the effects of LLLT on depression, anxiety and quality of life. Material and Method: Female CPPS were included in the study. LLLT was applied to the first group, and placebo (sham operation) was applied to the second group. Patients were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MMPQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and 36- Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), before the treatment, at the end of treatment, and 8 weeks after randomization. Results: The patients included in the treatment group (n = 11) and in the placebo group (n = 8) were calculated as 38.91 ± 5.20 and 37.25 ± 6.34, respectively. In the treatment group, a significant difference was found between the pre-treatment (VASPre-T) and end of treatment (VASPost-T) pain values and between pre-treatment (VASPre-T) pain values and pain values measured 8 weeks after randomization (VAS8th-week) (p: 0.003, p: 0.003). Additionally, a significant improvement in MMPQ scores was also found in the treatment group. (p: 0.037 and p: 0.008 respectively). When the MMPQ and BDI values in both groups were compared, there was no difference (p>0.05). Furthermore, it was observed that the level of anxiety (BAI) decreased at the end of the treatment, although not significantly, in the placebo group (p: 0.12), Additionally, significant improvements were observed in terms of SF-36 quality of life scale sub-scores. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that LLLT, a simple, non-invasive, inexpensive and safe treatment method, can be useful in the treatment of CPPS. Yet, large-scale multi-center studies are needed to support the positive results found in favor of LLLT in this study.

Surgery and Clinical PracticeVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Female Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study — Hatice Reşorlu, Alî Keskin, et al. · Surgery and Clinical Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS