Hysteroscopy and ART: Defying Clinical Indications Based on Current Evidence

Embryo’s Implantation is a question that we are not in the position to answer in full details. We know that it depends on embryo’s quality and uterine receptivity. It is possible to access uterine cavity before in vitro fertilisation by a variety of tools, however hysteroscopy is the gold standard in evaluation of uterine cavity and potential pathology. The frequencies of unrecognised uterine pathology revealed by hysteroscopy are 18-50% and 40-43% in patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation or after recurrent implantation failure respectively. Data is inconclusive regarding the role of hysteroscopy on pregnancy outcome after ART. This review aims to evaluate the validity of office hysteroscopy in subfertile population before or after at least one failed fertility treatment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Surgery and Clinical Practice
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33425/3066-6538.1008
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hysteroscopy and ART: Defying Clinical Indications Based on Current Evidence

Dimitrios Lentzaris, Minas Paschopoulos, Fani Gkrozou, Angelos Daniilidis et al.
Surgery and Clinical Practice
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Hysteroscopy and ART: Defying Clinical Indications Based on Current Evidence

Dimitrios Lentzaris, Minas Paschopoulos, Fani Gkrozou, Angelos Daniilidis, Nikoleta Koutalia, Anastasia Vatopoulou, Dimitrios Bouras-Soulimas, Vasileios Bais, Chara Skentou
article en

Abstract

Embryo’s Implantation is a question that we are not in the position to answer in full details. We know that it depends on embryo’s quality and uterine receptivity. It is possible to access uterine cavity before in vitro fertilisation by a variety of tools, however hysteroscopy is the gold standard in evaluation of uterine cavity and potential pathology. The frequencies of unrecognised uterine pathology revealed by hysteroscopy are 18-50% and 40-43% in patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation or after recurrent implantation failure respectively. Data is inconclusive regarding the role of hysteroscopy on pregnancy outcome after ART. This review aims to evaluate the validity of office hysteroscopy in subfertile population before or after at least one failed fertility treatment.

Surgery and Clinical PracticeVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hysteroscopy and ART: Defying Clinical Indications Based on Current Evidence — Dimitrios Lentzaris, Minas Paschopoulos, et al. · Surgery and Clinical Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS