“They Don't Even Know How Ethnocentric They're Being”: Comparative Approaches to Worldview Diversity Education

Is diversity education in international education ethnocentric? Viewed from a critical internationalization studies lens, how diversity work is framed, crafted, or exported has the potential to ‘other’ alternate worldviews and reinforce neocolonial relations in international higher education. Conversely, global diversity education offers an opportunity to collectively reimagine internationalization as otherwise, encouraging mutuality in theorizing and contextualization in praxis. This article presents findings from a sequential exploratory comparative case study of approaches to worldview diversity education that combined a representational survey with elite interviews of global liberal arts campus leaders, unearthing commonalities as well as critiques of Global North dominance in international diversity, equity, inclusion, justice and belonging (DEIJB) work. In amplifying the leaders’ common expressions of worldview diversity education and highlighting their critiques and recommendations for practice, this article offers global perspective to enhance epistemic justice in the conceptualization and delivery of global diversity education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Studies in International Education
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153251316925
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Education and Multiculturalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“They Don't Even Know How Ethnocentric They're Being”: Comparative Approaches to Worldview Diversity Education

Renee L. Bowling
1 citations
Journal of Studies in International Education
Global Education and Multiculturalism
8.93
article

“They Don't Even Know How Ethnocentric They're Being”: Comparative Approaches to Worldview Diversity Education

Renee L. Bowling
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Is diversity education in international education ethnocentric? Viewed from a critical internationalization studies lens, how diversity work is framed, crafted, or exported has the potential to ‘other’ alternate worldviews and reinforce neocolonial relations in international higher education. Conversely, global diversity education offers an opportunity to collectively reimagine internationalization as otherwise, encouraging mutuality in theorizing and contextualization in praxis. This article presents findings from a sequential exploratory comparative case study of approaches to worldview diversity education that combined a representational survey with elite interviews of global liberal arts campus leaders, unearthing commonalities as well as critiques of Global North dominance in international diversity, equity, inclusion, justice and belonging (DEIJB) work. In amplifying the leaders’ common expressions of worldview diversity education and highlighting their critiques and recommendations for practice, this article offers global perspective to enhance epistemic justice in the conceptualization and delivery of global diversity education.

Journal of Studies in International EducationVol. 29(4)
The Ohio State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Education and Multiculturalism
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.