Decoding implementation of African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights decisions on communications in Botswana, Kenya and Ethiopia

This article evaluates the implementation status of decisions by the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights on individual communications involving Botswana, Ethiopia and Kenya. The analysis includes all publicly-available decisions on the merits against these countries as at the end of 2022. The primary objective is to determine whether these states have complied with the Commission's decisions. The findings indicate that none of the three countries has fully complied with the decisions. Kenya has partially implemented two of the three decisions against it, while Botswana has only partially complied with one out of four decisions. Ethiopia has not complied with either of the two decisions against it. The article also reveals that the Commission's monitoring of the implementation of its recommendations has been generally inadequate, except for the Endorois case against Kenya, where it undertook relatively commendable follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Human Rights Law Journal
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2024/v24n2a17
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding implementation of African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights decisions on communications in Botswana, Kenya and Ethiopia

Henok Ashagrey Kremte, Jonathan O Obwogi
African Human Rights Law Journal
Human Rights and Development
article

Decoding implementation of African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights decisions on communications in Botswana, Kenya and Ethiopia

Henok Ashagrey Kremte, Jonathan O Obwogi
article en

Abstract

This article evaluates the implementation status of decisions by the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights on individual communications involving Botswana, Ethiopia and Kenya. The analysis includes all publicly-available decisions on the merits against these countries as at the end of 2022. The primary objective is to determine whether these states have complied with the Commission's decisions. The findings indicate that none of the three countries has fully complied with the decisions. Kenya has partially implemented two of the three decisions against it, while Botswana has only partially complied with one out of four decisions. Ethiopia has not complied with either of the two decisions against it. The article also reveals that the Commission's monitoring of the implementation of its recommendations has been generally inadequate, except for the Endorois case against Kenya, where it undertook relatively commendable follow-up.

African Human Rights Law JournalVol. 24(2)
Office of the General Counsel (US), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decoding implementation of African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights decisions on communications in Botswana, Kenya and Ethiopia — Henok Ashagrey Kremte, Jonathan O Obwogi · African Human Rights Law Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS