Host‐Cleptoparasite Biogeographical Congruence Through Time: The Case of Cuckoo Oil Bees
ABSTRACT Aim Insect brood parasites (i.e., cleptoparasites), like cuckoo bees, typically attack hosts within specific lineages, but seem to be less constrained by the biogeographical movements of their hosts compared to obligate parasites. Cuckoo bees depend on stable host populations, being particularly sensitive to environmental changes and thus valuable bioindicators of the bee community health. We here test the congruence between the biogeographical history of cuckoo oil bees and their oil bee hosts. Location The Americas. Taxon Bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Methods Using phylogenomic and Sanger sequence data, we present new time‐calibrated phylogenies for cuckoo oil bees in the ericrocidine line and their oil bee hosts, Centris and Epicharis. We estimate their ancestral ranges using six historical biogeographical models on a set of 100 trees, randomly sampled from the posterior distribution of phylogenies in each group, thus accounting for uncertainties in divergence time estimates and model selection. Results The origin of the hosts stem in the Cretaceous precedes the origin of their cleptoparasite's stem in the Palaeocene. Cleptoparasite and host crown origins were synchronous in the Eocene, and both took place in tropical South America. While the pair Rhathymini‐ Epicharis remained mostly associated within this region, Centris and their cleptoparasites expanded their distribution to other parts of Neotropical and Nearctic regions in independent range expansions events. In all cases, host range shifts preceded the cleptoparasite shifts. Main Conclusion The biogeographical history of cleptoparasitic oil bees and oil‐collecting hosts is generally congruent in time and space. Events of range expansion mainly occurred in the more species‐rich lineages of cleptoparasites. Range shifts in cleptoparasites followed the distribution of their hosts and coincided with the distribution of oil‐producing plants visited by the host bees. Our results broaden our understanding of the complex biogeography of interacting partners and on how changes in host distributions may impact cleptoparasitic bees.
Authors
- Michael G. Branstetter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-6166)
- Thaís Vasconcelos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9991-7924)
- Felipe V. Freitas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6021-3022)
- Léo Correia da Rocha‐Filho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3431-6009)
- Antônio J. C. Aguiar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1319-6431)
- Aline C. Martins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2305-2877)
- Eduardo A. B. Almeida (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6017-6364)
Institutions
- Utah State University (US)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR)
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Biogeography
- Published
- 2025-02-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.15101
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Plant and animal studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.03
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Lung Cancer Research Foundation
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal
- Agricultural Research Service
- Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade