Parametric vs. Non-Parametric Approach for the Estimation of the SPI Drought Index

Accurate drought identification is important for both scientists and decision-makers to be able to make informative decisions. In this study, parametric and non-parametric approaches for analyzing meteorological drought are compared, aiming at simplifying the calculation of the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). The comparison is performed across various meteorological stations covering the entire territory of Greece, using monthly rainfall data spanning from 1961 to 2021. Meteorological drought is assessed through the SPI for the 12-month reference period. A two-parameter gamma distribution, with parameters estimated using the maximum likelihood estimation method, is employed for the estimation of the SPI drought index as the parametric classic approach. For the non-parametric approach, the SPI drought index is estimated using six empirical probability plotting positions: Beard, Blom, Cunnane, Gringorten, Hazen, and Weibull. Results indicate that the empirical approach can effectively identify drought events in comparison to the classic approach. However, caution is advised, particularly when different drought classes are identified, as the non-parametric approaches may underestimate drought severity. In addition, for the Greek meteorological conditions, the results revealed that in the case of extreme drought events, the estimation of SPI employing the classic approach is to be preferred.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17030450
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parametric vs. Non-Parametric Approach for the Estimation of the SPI Drought Index

Harris Vangelis, Ioannis M. Kourtis
3 citations
Water
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
3.32
article

Parametric vs. Non-Parametric Approach for the Estimation of the SPI Drought Index

Harris Vangelis, Ioannis M. Kourtis
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accurate drought identification is important for both scientists and decision-makers to be able to make informative decisions. In this study, parametric and non-parametric approaches for analyzing meteorological drought are compared, aiming at simplifying the calculation of the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). The comparison is performed across various meteorological stations covering the entire territory of Greece, using monthly rainfall data spanning from 1961 to 2021. Meteorological drought is assessed through the SPI for the 12-month reference period. A two-parameter gamma distribution, with parameters estimated using the maximum likelihood estimation method, is employed for the estimation of the SPI drought index as the parametric classic approach. For the non-parametric approach, the SPI drought index is estimated using six empirical probability plotting positions: Beard, Blom, Cunnane, Gringorten, Hazen, and Weibull. Results indicate that the empirical approach can effectively identify drought events in comparison to the classic approach. However, caution is advised, particularly when different drought classes are identified, as the non-parametric approaches may underestimate drought severity. In addition, for the Greek meteorological conditions, the results revealed that in the case of extreme drought events, the estimation of SPI employing the classic approach is to be preferred.

WaterVol. 17(3)
National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.