Clinician Perspectives of Barriers and Enablers to Quality Cardiogenic Shock Care: A Focus Group Study

Five focus groups were conducted, including 19 participants (11 male and eight female), comprising seven intensive care unit physicians, seven nurse consultants/educators, three cardiologists, and two emergency department physicians working in metropolitan and rural, regional, or remote health settings. Five themes were identified: CONCLUSIONS: This study provided critical insights into the barriers and possible enablers to delivering best practice care and optimal outcomes for patients with cardiogenic shock. There is scope for an improved model of care in cardiogenic shock management to address inequalities emerging from multifactorial complexities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart Lung and Circulation
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.12.002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinician Perspectives of Barriers and Enablers to Quality Cardiogenic Shock Care: A Focus Group Study

Pankaj Jain, Sabine Allida, Scott William, Mark Dennis et al.
2 citations
Heart Lung and Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
1.35
article

Clinician Perspectives of Barriers and Enablers to Quality Cardiogenic Shock Care: A Focus Group Study

Pankaj Jain, Sabine Allida, Scott William, Mark Dennis, Caleb Ferguson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Five focus groups were conducted, including 19 participants (11 male and eight female), comprising seven intensive care unit physicians, seven nurse consultants/educators, three cardiologists, and two emergency department physicians working in metropolitan and rural, regional, or remote health settings. Five themes were identified: CONCLUSIONS: This study provided critical insights into the barriers and possible enablers to delivering best practice care and optimal outcomes for patients with cardiogenic shock. There is scope for an improved model of care in cardiogenic shock management to address inequalities emerging from multifactorial complexities.

Heart Lung and CirculationVol. 34(5)
University of Wollongong (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Wollongong Hospital (AU)
Australian Government, National Heart Foundation of Australia, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.