Stratified Assessment of Urban Low-Carbon Travel Potential

Non-motorised travel and public transportation travel are recognised as low-carbon travel modes, in contrast to car travel, which is considered a non-low-carbon option. Based on this, the paper proposes a stratified assessment method for the urban low-carbon travel potential. The proportion of the motorised travel population that could potentially shift to non-motorised travel within the entire travel population is defined as the urban Tier 1 low-carbon travel potential. Meanwhile, the proportion of the car travel population that could potentially shift to public transportation travel within the entire travel population is defined as the urban Tier 2 low-carbon travel potential. This method holistically presents the potential for improvement in urban traffic carbon emission control. This method considers distance as a primary negative factor affecting the residents’ willingness to engage in non-motorised travel compared to motorised travel. Additionally, it recognises connection, delay and transfer as the main negative factors influencing the residents’ willingness for public transportation travel over car travel. By comparing the actual travel distances of residents and the actual intensity of connection, delay and transfer in public transportation travel modes with the assumed maximum acceptable distances and intensity for residents, the method identifies the number of people who could potentially shift to corresponding levels of low-carbon travel in hypothetical scenarios. Based on this, the corresponding low-carbon travel potential values are calculated. The method then further analyses the trend of these values as the residents’ acceptable thresholds for non-motorised travel distances and acceptable intensity for public transportation travel connection, delay and transfer change. A relationship curve is fitted, which intriguingly exhibits a reverse “S” shape, allowing for the identification of the “rapid release zone” and “key points” on the curve. These insights are essential for effectively targeting interventions to increase the adoption of low-carbon travel modes. This paper takes the cities of Shanghai and Wuhan in China as examples, conducting a stratified assessment of the low-carbon travel potential for both cities based on 19,732 daily travel origin– destination (OD) survey samples from residents. Additionally, the low-carbon travel potential of the two cities is visualised by district, enabling an analysis of the characteristics of low-carbon travel potential in each city and a comparison of the differences in low-carbon travel potential between them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PROMET - Traffic&Transportation
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v37i1.710
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stratified Assessment of Urban Low-Carbon Travel Potential

Keyuan Ding, Ran Peng, Xu Zhou, Yan Zhang et al.
PROMET - Traffic&Transportation
Transportation Planning and Optimization
article

Stratified Assessment of Urban Low-Carbon Travel Potential

Keyuan Ding, Ran Peng, Xu Zhou, Yan Zhang, Hongchang Guo
article en

Abstract

Non-motorised travel and public transportation travel are recognised as low-carbon travel modes, in contrast to car travel, which is considered a non-low-carbon option. Based on this, the paper proposes a stratified assessment method for the urban low-carbon travel potential. The proportion of the motorised travel population that could potentially shift to non-motorised travel within the entire travel population is defined as the urban Tier 1 low-carbon travel potential. Meanwhile, the proportion of the car travel population that could potentially shift to public transportation travel within the entire travel population is defined as the urban Tier 2 low-carbon travel potential. This method holistically presents the potential for improvement in urban traffic carbon emission control. This method considers distance as a primary negative factor affecting the residents’ willingness to engage in non-motorised travel compared to motorised travel. Additionally, it recognises connection, delay and transfer as the main negative factors influencing the residents’ willingness for public transportation travel over car travel. By comparing the actual travel distances of residents and the actual intensity of connection, delay and transfer in public transportation travel modes with the assumed maximum acceptable distances and intensity for residents, the method identifies the number of people who could potentially shift to corresponding levels of low-carbon travel in hypothetical scenarios. Based on this, the corresponding low-carbon travel potential values are calculated. The method then further analyses the trend of these values as the residents’ acceptable thresholds for non-motorised travel distances and acceptable intensity for public transportation travel connection, delay and transfer change. A relationship curve is fitted, which intriguingly exhibits a reverse “S” shape, allowing for the identification of the “rapid release zone” and “key points” on the curve. These insights are essential for effectively targeting interventions to increase the adoption of low-carbon travel modes. This paper takes the cities of Shanghai and Wuhan in China as examples, conducting a stratified assessment of the low-carbon travel potential for both cities based on 19,732 daily travel origin– destination (OD) survey samples from residents. Additionally, the low-carbon travel potential of the two cities is visualised by district, enabling an analysis of the characteristics of low-carbon travel potential in each city and a comparison of the differences in low-carbon travel potential between them.

PROMET - Traffic&TransportationVol. 37(1)
Wuhan University of Technology (CN), Ministry of Education (TW), Wuhan Institute of Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Tongji University, Beijing Jiaotong University, Wuhan Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.