Taxing Language: Do Interpreting Fees Affect Immigrant Healthcare Usage? Evidence From a Regression Discontinuity Design

ABSTRACT Research has shown that administrative burdens significantly influence benefit uptake across various welfare programs in the U.S. and beyond. However, much of the existing research has focused primarily on program take‐up, leaving a gap in our understanding of how burdens affect the ongoing use of welfare benefits. To address this gap, we utilize a regression discontinuity design to analyze how the introduction of substantial fees on interpreting services affects usage of healthcare services among Danish immigrants. Our data comes from highly reliable, detailed registries that track the weekly use of general practitioners by Danish immigrants. We find no effects of the fees on healthcare utilization and no evidence that the fees disproportionately affect disadvantaged groups. Additional survey‐based analyses suggest that doctors may use their discretion to mitigate the fee's impact on immigrants, highlighting how frontline workers can potentially reduce the effects of burdensome policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13930
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxing Language: Do Interpreting Fees Affect Immigrant Healthcare Usage? Evidence From a Regression Discontinuity Design

Aske Halling
2 citations
Public Administration Review
Healthcare Policy and Management
6.26
article

Taxing Language: Do Interpreting Fees Affect Immigrant Healthcare Usage? Evidence From a Regression Discontinuity Design

Aske Halling
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research has shown that administrative burdens significantly influence benefit uptake across various welfare programs in the U.S. and beyond. However, much of the existing research has focused primarily on program take‐up, leaving a gap in our understanding of how burdens affect the ongoing use of welfare benefits. To address this gap, we utilize a regression discontinuity design to analyze how the introduction of substantial fees on interpreting services affects usage of healthcare services among Danish immigrants. Our data comes from highly reliable, detailed registries that track the weekly use of general practitioners by Danish immigrants. We find no effects of the fees on healthcare utilization and no evidence that the fees disproportionately affect disadvantaged groups. Additional survey‐based analyses suggest that doctors may use their discretion to mitigate the fee's impact on immigrants, highlighting how frontline workers can potentially reduce the effects of burdensome policies.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(4)
Aarhus University (DK)
European Commission, European Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Policy and Management
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.