Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of diagnostic criteria for keratoconus

Relevance. Corneal pachymetry is one of the main criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. Using the most accurate and reliable measurement method allows for correct diagnosis and timely treatment. Purpose of the study. To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) pachymetry and Scheimpflug keratotopography (SK) pachymetry data and establish their reliability, sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of keratoconus. Material and methods. The study included 212 eyes (126 people), which were divided into two groups: the main group - patients with a confirmed diagnosis of grade 1–3 keratoconus. (according to Amsler), and a control group of ophthalmologically healthy volunteers. All patients underwent a standard ophthalmological examination, as well as pachymetry using (SK) (TOMEY TMS-5) and spectral OCT (SOCT Copernicus REVO 80). Results and conclusion. He presence of significant differences in pachymetry measurements on SK and OCT in patients with keratoconus must be taken into account when making a diagnosis, dynamic monitoring and determining treatment tactics. It is recommended to monitor the disease using data from devices operating on the same principle. Data from SK pachymetry and spectral OCT are highly accurate diagnostic criteria for keratoconus with high sensitivity and specificity. Keywords: keratoconus, pachymetry, cornea, Scheimpflug keratotopography, optical coherence tomography

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Modern technologies in ophtalmology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25276/2312-4911-2024-5-86-92
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of diagnostic criteria for keratoconus

Д.М. Туйчибаева, A.A. Kim
Modern technologies in ophtalmology
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of diagnostic criteria for keratoconus

Д.М. Туйчибаева, A.A. Kim
article en

Abstract

Relevance. Corneal pachymetry is one of the main criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. Using the most accurate and reliable measurement method allows for correct diagnosis and timely treatment. Purpose of the study. To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) pachymetry and Scheimpflug keratotopography (SK) pachymetry data and establish their reliability, sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of keratoconus. Material and methods. The study included 212 eyes (126 people), which were divided into two groups: the main group - patients with a confirmed diagnosis of grade 1–3 keratoconus. (according to Amsler), and a control group of ophthalmologically healthy volunteers. All patients underwent a standard ophthalmological examination, as well as pachymetry using (SK) (TOMEY TMS-5) and spectral OCT (SOCT Copernicus REVO 80). Results and conclusion. He presence of significant differences in pachymetry measurements on SK and OCT in patients with keratoconus must be taken into account when making a diagnosis, dynamic monitoring and determining treatment tactics. It is recommended to monitor the disease using data from devices operating on the same principle. Data from SK pachymetry and spectral OCT are highly accurate diagnostic criteria for keratoconus with high sensitivity and specificity. Keywords: keratoconus, pachymetry, cornea, Scheimpflug keratotopography, optical coherence tomography

Modern technologies in ophtalmologyVol. 57(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.