Neonatal Electroencephalogram Recording with a Dry Electrode Cap: A Feasibility Study
This study investigates the feasibility of a dry electrode cap design for neonatal electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. Recordings on a phantom and a real infant are compared between a novel dry electrode cap and a clinically used gel-based electrode cap. The phantom recordings included measuring both the electrode contact force and the signal quality during still and respiration-like head motion. The real infant recordings were assessed for the EEG signals' spectral characteristics, including powerline interference. Compared to gel-based caps, the dry caps showed a largely comparable skin force, an expectedly greater sensitivity to motion-induced artifacts, and a slightly lower powerline interference. Recordings on the real infant showed no significant skin marks after using the dry electrode, and the spectral compositions were comparable between dry- and gel-based electrode caps. These findings suggest that neonatal EEG recordings with a dry electrode cap are technically feasible, but movement-related artifacts, such as respiration in a supine lying infant, may challenge long-term recordings of spontaneous EEG activity. Yet, the ease of use of dry electrode caps calls for future studies to define the optimal use case in neonatal recordings.
Authors
- Sampsa Vanhatalo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9771-7061)
- Indhika Fauzhan Warsito (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-9867)
- Jens Haueisen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3871-2890)
- Patrique Fiedler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-0717)
- Amirreza Asayesh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0600-3344)
Institutions
- Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
- Jena University Hospital (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sensors
- Published
- 2025-02-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/s25030966
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.29