Rethinking the European Union Withdrawal Clause

The Lisbon Treaty introduced an EU withdrawal procedure in Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). However, the withdrawal procedure outlined in Article 50 TEU revealed a lack of clarity in withdrawal rules, highlighting the need for future amendments. This is particularly evident in aspects such as the setting of the two-year withdrawal period, the regulation of possible extensions of the withdrawal period, the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the withdrawal procedure, and the required majority for the conclusion of a withdrawal agreement. Keywords: withdrawal clause, Article 50 TEU, withdrawal agreement, Court of Justice of the EU. DOI: 10.3935/cyelp.20.2024.535 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. Suggested citation: A Ahmetović, ‘Rethinking the European Union Withdrawal Clause’ (2024) 20 CYELP 91.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.20.2024.535
Primary Topic
EU Law and Policy Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking the European Union Withdrawal Clause

Aldijana Ahmetović
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
EU Law and Policy Analysis
article

Rethinking the European Union Withdrawal Clause

Aldijana Ahmetović
article en

Abstract

The Lisbon Treaty introduced an EU withdrawal procedure in Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). However, the withdrawal procedure outlined in Article 50 TEU revealed a lack of clarity in withdrawal rules, highlighting the need for future amendments. This is particularly evident in aspects such as the setting of the two-year withdrawal period, the regulation of possible extensions of the withdrawal period, the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the withdrawal procedure, and the required majority for the conclusion of a withdrawal agreement. Keywords: withdrawal clause, Article 50 TEU, withdrawal agreement, Court of Justice of the EU. DOI: 10.3935/cyelp.20.2024.535 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. Suggested citation: A Ahmetović, ‘Rethinking the European Union Withdrawal Clause’ (2024) 20 CYELP 91.

Croatian Yearbook of European Law and PolicyVol. 20(1)
Center for Non-Communicable Diseases (PK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
EU Law and Policy Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.