Backgrounds for creating unified criteria for systemically important banks at the EAEU level: clustering approach

The problems of identifying systemically important banks have not lost their relevance for more than 10 years, and the issues of developing uniform criteria for them in economic unions are of particular interest. The formation of clusters of SIBs (systemically important banks) within the EAEU will improve the quality of financial services provided by the banks in the participating countries, and will also strengthen the innovative potential of the economic union. The purpose of the study is to examine, through the application of clustering methodology (Euclidean distance metrics and Hamming models), the backgrounds and fundamental possibilities for developing uniform criteria for identifying SIBs for Kazakhstan, Belarus and Russia, as participating countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. At the same time, methodological recommendations for national systemically important banks developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision are taken into account. The results of the study showed that the grouping of banks classified in individual EAEU countries as SIBs is logical when three clusters are identified: Level 1 (integration), Level 2 (country), and Level 3 (potential). The analysis emphasizes that when developing unified criteria, it is necessary to develop indicators that are not approximated with each other. In addition, the criteria must be clearly and strictly defined, and similar features (indicators) must be significantly different. The present study is comprised of two sections; this paper is part of the second section.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ECONOMIC Series of the Bulletin of the L N Gumilyov ENU
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32523/2789-4320-2024-4-178-194
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Backgrounds for creating unified criteria for systemically important banks at the EAEU level: clustering approach

E. A. Ruziyeva, A. Yu. Dalke, Aiman Nurgaliyeva
ECONOMIC Series of the Bulletin of the L N Gumilyov ENU
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
article

Backgrounds for creating unified criteria for systemically important banks at the EAEU level: clustering approach

E. A. Ruziyeva, A. Yu. Dalke, Aiman Nurgaliyeva
article en

Abstract

The problems of identifying systemically important banks have not lost their relevance for more than 10 years, and the issues of developing uniform criteria for them in economic unions are of particular interest. The formation of clusters of SIBs (systemically important banks) within the EAEU will improve the quality of financial services provided by the banks in the participating countries, and will also strengthen the innovative potential of the economic union. The purpose of the study is to examine, through the application of clustering methodology (Euclidean distance metrics and Hamming models), the backgrounds and fundamental possibilities for developing uniform criteria for identifying SIBs for Kazakhstan, Belarus and Russia, as participating countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. At the same time, methodological recommendations for national systemically important banks developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision are taken into account. The results of the study showed that the grouping of banks classified in individual EAEU countries as SIBs is logical when three clusters are identified: Level 1 (integration), Level 2 (country), and Level 3 (potential). The analysis emphasizes that when developing unified criteria, it is necessary to develop indicators that are not approximated with each other. In addition, the criteria must be clearly and strictly defined, and similar features (indicators) must be significantly different. The present study is comprised of two sections; this paper is part of the second section.

ECONOMIC Series of the Bulletin of the L N Gumilyov ENU(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.