Applying debriefings in the context of higher education: How joint reflection fosters students’ collaborative problem solving

Abstract During collaborative problem solving, higher education students experience various challenges like communication and coordination issues. Moreover, they often report feeling unprepared to work in collaborative environments. Hence, despite the benefits of learning and working together, some groups fail to function, resulting in poor performance, low learning gains and dissatisfaction among group members. The current study investigates the potential of group reflexivity interventions (i.e., debriefings) as a means to foster students’ collaboration, performance and learning gain. Using a pretest–posttest design, 38 higher education students worked together in 14 teams to solve a collaborative problem-solving task in a hackathon-like setting. At the midpoint of the teams’ collaboration, they conducted either a debriefing (experimental condition) or a filler task (control condition). Quantitative (e.g., questionnaires) and qualitative data (e.g., video recordings) were collected and evaluated. Statistical analyses revealed beneficial effects for collaboration, but not for performance and learning gain. Observing the teams during the debriefings provided further insights into students’ joint reflection processes. The findings emphasize the potential of self-led debriefings in fostering students’ collaboration. Our study helps in understanding the linkage between debriefing and collaboration more precisely. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology of Education
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09991-3
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying debriefings in the context of higher education: How joint reflection fosters students’ collaborative problem solving

Nicki Marquardt, Daniel Bodemer, Verena Schürmann
5 citations
Social Psychology of Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
44.63
article

Applying debriefings in the context of higher education: How joint reflection fosters students’ collaborative problem solving

Nicki Marquardt, Daniel Bodemer, Verena Schürmann
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract During collaborative problem solving, higher education students experience various challenges like communication and coordination issues. Moreover, they often report feeling unprepared to work in collaborative environments. Hence, despite the benefits of learning and working together, some groups fail to function, resulting in poor performance, low learning gains and dissatisfaction among group members. The current study investigates the potential of group reflexivity interventions (i.e., debriefings) as a means to foster students’ collaboration, performance and learning gain. Using a pretest–posttest design, 38 higher education students worked together in 14 teams to solve a collaborative problem-solving task in a hackathon-like setting. At the midpoint of the teams’ collaboration, they conducted either a debriefing (experimental condition) or a filler task (control condition). Quantitative (e.g., questionnaires) and qualitative data (e.g., video recordings) were collected and evaluated. Statistical analyses revealed beneficial effects for collaboration, but not for performance and learning gain. Observing the teams during the debriefings provided further insights into students’ joint reflection processes. The findings emphasize the potential of self-led debriefings in fostering students’ collaboration. Our study helps in understanding the linkage between debriefing and collaboration more precisely. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Social Psychology of EducationVol. 28(1)
University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
44.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.